Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26451 - 26460 of 65562 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 26451 - 26460 of 65562 for divorce records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
) (Dec. 2000). This finding was based on a transcript of a recorded telephone call from prison, in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34526 - 2008-11-05
) (Dec. 2000). This finding was based on a transcript of a recorded telephone call from prison, in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34526 - 2008-11-05
State v. Mai Lee Vue
. Vue has not done so. This court has conducted the independent review of the record that is required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8797 - 2005-03-31
. Vue has not done so. This court has conducted the independent review of the record that is required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8797 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Garry A. Borzych v. Daniel Bertrand
should be vacated because the record did not support the increased penalty. The court relied on State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20742 - 2017-09-21
should be vacated because the record did not support the increased penalty. The court relied on State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20742 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=885624 - 2024-12-05
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=885624 - 2024-12-05
State v. Luegene Hampton
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9935 - 2005-03-31
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9935 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eduardo Perez
. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] The record of the Monroe County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9778 - 2005-03-31
. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] The record of the Monroe County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9778 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286985 - 2020-09-16
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286985 - 2020-09-16
CA Blank Order
, but has not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98531 - 2013-06-23
, but has not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98531 - 2013-06-23
CA Blank Order
and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105187 - 2013-12-02
and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105187 - 2013-12-02
State v. Shamseldin Ali Abdelwarress
upon the facts appearing in the record and in reliance on the appropriate and applicable law.'” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9685 - 2005-03-31
upon the facts appearing in the record and in reliance on the appropriate and applicable law.'” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9685 - 2005-03-31