Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26451 - 26460 of 51921 for him.
Search results 26451 - 26460 of 51921 for him.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel filed a motion seeking a new trial, arguing that Kupsky’s trial counsel provided him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948937 - 2025-04-29
counsel filed a motion seeking a new trial, arguing that Kupsky’s trial counsel provided him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948937 - 2025-04-29
COURT OF APPEALS
Wright argues that there were no grounds to revoke him because the administrative law judge found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29734 - 2007-07-17
Wright argues that there were no grounds to revoke him because the administrative law judge found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29734 - 2007-07-17
[PDF]
Michael D. Gregory, Jr. v. Samuel Webster
connects [him] to the property alleged.” Thus, Webster concludes that Gregory failed to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5028 - 2017-09-19
connects [him] to the property alleged.” Thus, Webster concludes that Gregory failed to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5028 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
property. Pulla further believed that portions of the allegedly encroaching fence belonged to him, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182021 - 2017-09-21
property. Pulla further believed that portions of the allegedly encroaching fence belonged to him, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182021 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Debra A.E. allows him to proceed with a § 974.06 motion now. Guman also contends that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132843 - 2015-01-12
Debra A.E. allows him to proceed with a § 974.06 motion now. Guman also contends that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132843 - 2015-01-12
State v. William Medina
weapon because the jury had found him not guilty of using a dangerous weapon by acquitting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6197 - 2005-03-31
weapon because the jury had found him not guilty of using a dangerous weapon by acquitting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6197 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals related judgments convicting him of three drug charges and an order denying his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134887 - 2017-09-21
appeals related judgments convicting him of three drug charges and an order denying his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134887 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
) Before Curley, P.J., Brennan and Bradley, JJ. Shawn D. Jones appeals a judgment convicting him of one
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144593 - 2015-07-13
) Before Curley, P.J., Brennan and Bradley, JJ. Shawn D. Jones appeals a judgment convicting him of one
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144593 - 2015-07-13
State v. Mark H.K.
HOOVER, P.J.[1] Mark H.K. appeals a dispositional order adjudicating him delinquent for criminal damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4905 - 2005-03-31
HOOVER, P.J.[1] Mark H.K. appeals a dispositional order adjudicating him delinquent for criminal damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4905 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dean T. Schaefer
him to have a driver’s license. Therefore, it was reasonable for the officer to believe the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7598 - 2005-03-31
him to have a driver’s license. Therefore, it was reasonable for the officer to believe the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7598 - 2005-03-31