Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26451 - 26460 of 76954 for judgment for u s.
Search results 26451 - 26460 of 76954 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 We agree with the circuit court that D.L.’s habeas claims were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206911 - 2018-01-17
. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 We agree with the circuit court that D.L.’s habeas claims were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206911 - 2018-01-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.’s appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.107(5m). D.G
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219818 - 2018-09-26
.’s appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.107(5m). D.G
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219818 - 2018-09-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
28, 2016. The State filed petitions to terminate K-L.G.’s parental rights to K.S. and J-L.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=441752 - 2021-10-19
28, 2016. The State filed petitions to terminate K-L.G.’s parental rights to K.S. and J-L.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=441752 - 2021-10-19
State v. Roger L. Eternicka
the jury that on May 31, 1992, C.B.'s mother and D.J. were baby sitting for C.B. On June 1, while C.B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8684 - 2005-03-31
the jury that on May 31, 1992, C.B.'s mother and D.J. were baby sitting for C.B. On June 1, while C.B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8684 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 51.61(1)(g)4. because the County did not “explain the alternatives to [F.E.K.’s] medication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140986 - 2015-04-29
. Stat. § 51.61(1)(g)4. because the County did not “explain the alternatives to [F.E.K.’s] medication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140986 - 2015-04-29
[PDF]
State v. Roger L. Eternicka
the petition would inform the jury that on May 31, 1992, C.B.'s mother and D.J. were baby sitting for C.B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8684 - 2017-09-19
the petition would inform the jury that on May 31, 1992, C.B.'s mother and D.J. were baby sitting for C.B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8684 - 2017-09-19
State v. Patricia T.
On March 3, 2000, the State filed a petition seeking to terminate Patricia T.’s parental rights to Carla
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3503 - 2005-03-31
On March 3, 2000, the State filed a petition seeking to terminate Patricia T.’s parental rights to Carla
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3503 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald T.
not consider the appropriate statutory factors.[2] Rather, Ronald T.'s sole argument on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9082 - 2005-03-31
not consider the appropriate statutory factors.[2] Rather, Ronald T.'s sole argument on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9082 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ronald T.
attempted to violate s. 940.01 on or after the child's 14th birthday or is alleged to have violated s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9082 - 2017-09-19
attempted to violate s. 940.01 on or after the child's 14th birthday or is alleged to have violated s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9082 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Patricia T.
Patricia T.’s parental rights to Carla, then eleven, and Sylvester, then five. On August 22, 2000, less
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3501 - 2017-09-19
Patricia T.’s parental rights to Carla, then eleven, and Sylvester, then five. On August 22, 2000, less
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3501 - 2017-09-19