Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26451 - 26460 of 46060 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] State v. Daniel Anderson
that this court analyzes claims of multiplicity using a two-prong test: 1) whether the charged offenses
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17082 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the offenses are identical in law and in fact by applying the “elements-only” test. Id. (citing Blockburger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399778 - 2021-07-27

State v. Juan Eugenio
and we turn to an examination of the facts and the proper test to be applied to those facts under Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17116 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
test is the same as the test for ineffective assistance of counsel, and requires a probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36801 - 2009-06-16

State v. Daniel Anderson
-prong test: 1) whether the charged offenses are identical in law and fact; and 2) if the offenses
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17082 - 2005-03-31

State v. Steve Yang
Assistance of Trial Counsel ¶11 The familiar two-pronged test for ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6528 - 2005-03-31

State v. Antonio McAfee
microscope testing in an attempt to determine who fired the bullet that killed Officer Tanner. The testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18213 - 2005-05-23

State v. Melvin S. Lewis
a two-part test.[11] See State v. Lechner, 217 Wis. 2d 392, 402-03, 576 N.W.2d 912 (1998). First, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2389 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Daniel Anderson
that this court analyzes claims of multiplicity using a two-prong test: 1) whether the charged offenses
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17083 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] School District of Slinger v. Wisconsin Interscholastic Athletic Association
298, 305-06, 459 N.W.2d 581, 585 (Ct. App. 1990). The test is not whether the appellate court would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11638 - 2017-09-19