Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26481 - 26490 of 30059 for de.
Search results 26481 - 26490 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Joseph Steffes
erroneous, and we review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5257 - 2017-09-19
erroneous, and we review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5257 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief.” Id., ¶14. This is a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125349 - 2017-09-21
that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief.” Id., ¶14. This is a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125349 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that we review de novo. See id. at 634. To demonstrate deficient performance, the defendant must show
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260817 - 2020-05-19
that we review de novo. See id. at 634. To demonstrate deficient performance, the defendant must show
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260817 - 2020-05-19
[PDF]
Theresa Dittberner v. Windsor Sanitary District Number 1
the same methodology as the trial court and we consider the issues de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10607 - 2017-09-20
the same methodology as the trial court and we consider the issues de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10607 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Karen Wipperfurth v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
de novo, applying the same methodology and standards as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11359 - 2017-09-19
de novo, applying the same methodology and standards as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11359 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88167 - 2014-09-15
the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88167 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Sharon A. Dixon
, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3555 - 2017-09-19
, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3555 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and prejudicial, however, are questions of law we decide de novo. Id. No. 2010AP2946
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65601 - 2014-09-15
was deficient and prejudicial, however, are questions of law we decide de novo. Id. No. 2010AP2946
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65601 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
on the interpretation and application of statutes and therefore presents issues of law that we consider de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=882101 - 2024-11-27
on the interpretation and application of statutes and therefore presents issues of law that we consider de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=882101 - 2024-11-27
State v. Charles D. Young
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Waldner, 206 Wis.2d 51, 54, 556 N.W.2d 681, 683
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11920 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Waldner, 206 Wis.2d 51, 54, 556 N.W.2d 681, 683
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11920 - 2005-03-31