Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26481 - 26490 of 40029 for financial disclosure statement.

[PDF] Bharati Holtzman v. Jon E. Holtzman
testimony and statements of psychologists and therapists involved with the family. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25867 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Antonio Herrera, Jr.
. Most of this evidence consists of statements Herrera made to other witnesses describing his motives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3644 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. The officer’s testimony about the officer’s observations and the victim’s statements was not inherently
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246865 - 2019-09-13

[PDF] NOTICE
with the judge continuing to preside. When asked to confirm counsel’s statement, Visgar personally confirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34117 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Alanna J. Kirt
is the natural outgrowth of the supreme court’s statements in Neitzel and this court’s observation in Stary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12781 - 2017-09-21

American West Insurance Company v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
primary coverage in the absence of a specific statement to the contrary. The policy is not sufficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10570 - 2005-03-31

Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Frank X. Kinast
forth in his billing statement and that the resulting fee was reasonable. ¶8 We adopt the referee's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17350 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
. As the no-merit report points out, the court may hear relevant statements at sentencing. WIS. STAT. § 972.14(3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96748 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Frank X. Kinast
and that of the expert who testified that Attorney Kinast in fact spent the time set forth in his billing statement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17350 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The initial motion included a jurisdictional statement, “This motion is pursuant to Wis. Stat. 971.08(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172704 - 2017-09-21