Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26481 - 26490 of 44385 for name change.
Search results 26481 - 26490 of 44385 for name change.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the Rules of Community Supervision applicable to Rodriguez, including: (1) changing residences without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92114 - 2013-01-28
of the Rules of Community Supervision applicable to Rodriguez, including: (1) changing residences without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92114 - 2013-01-28
State v. Richard F. Pfeiffer
that Juanita’s unspecified observation would change the outcome of the trial. ¶18 Judy acknowledged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15532 - 2005-03-31
that Juanita’s unspecified observation would change the outcome of the trial. ¶18 Judy acknowledged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15532 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Marlin Easttown, L.L.C. v. Shopko Stores, Inc.
benefited Parcel; or narrow the Ring Road or any Access Roads on its Parcel; or change, other than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3635 - 2017-09-19
benefited Parcel; or narrow the Ring Road or any Access Roads on its Parcel; or change, other than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3635 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. William H. Warren
. No. 95-3185-CR -11- A “new factor” that warrants a change in sentence is an event
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9982 - 2017-09-19
. No. 95-3185-CR -11- A “new factor” that warrants a change in sentence is an event
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9982 - 2017-09-19
Roxanne Martinson v. Allstate Indemnity Company
to the court’s instructions. She also asked the court to either change the answers or order a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2649 - 2005-03-31
to the court’s instructions. She also asked the court to either change the answers or order a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2649 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mary V. Skolaski v. Craig Frank
, the court noted that the “frame of reference in which the old common-law rule operated has changed.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12864 - 2017-09-21
, the court noted that the “frame of reference in which the old common-law rule operated has changed.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12864 - 2017-09-21
State v. Shawn Riley
reason “contemplates ‘the mere showing of some adequate reason for defendant’s change of heart.’” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2378 - 2005-03-31
reason “contemplates ‘the mere showing of some adequate reason for defendant’s change of heart.’” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2378 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Tommie Thames
not change the result. When no appeal is taken, all provisions of a judgment, and the findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17647 - 2017-09-21
not change the result. When no appeal is taken, all provisions of a judgment, and the findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17647 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Marquette University v. Debbie A. Lapertosa
to be an excused absence. Moreover, her failing grade was changed to an “IX” for “incomplete course work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15513 - 2017-09-21
to be an excused absence. Moreover, her failing grade was changed to an “IX” for “incomplete course work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15513 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, it concluded there was no prejudice from the failure to call her: Jones’s version of events had changed so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91549 - 2013-01-14
, it concluded there was no prejudice from the failure to call her: Jones’s version of events had changed so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91549 - 2013-01-14