Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26481 - 26490 of 41665 for new88v.net ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿน new88 ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿน new 88 ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿน new88vnet ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿน nha cai new88 ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿน new88v.net.

State v. Daniel R. Davis
been "tried under the old law, instead of the new case law." Davis does not expand on this argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8660 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
neither an erroneous exercise of sentencing discretion nor a new factor. Kimbrough did not appeal either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28957 - 2007-06-26

[PDF] Supreme Court Statistics January
in selected cases. During February, 42 new petitions for review were filed. In addition, the Supreme Court
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1091700 - 2026-03-12

[PDF] CA Blank Order
appeal as a petition for a supervisory writ, Johnson asks us to treat it as a new petition for a writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928081 - 2025-03-18

Certification
a permit for any new or expanded sand or gravel pit. The procedure for applying for a permit includes
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66539 - 2011-06-27

CA Blank Order
that resulted in a not guilty verdict following a jury trial. We disagree. Dahms cites Apprendi v. New Jersey
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107618 - 2014-01-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
conditions prohibited him from committing any new crimes. The State charged him with four counts: child
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=902121 - 2025-01-22

State v. Samantha H.
. [1] This section has been repealed by 1995 Wis. Act 77, ยง 288. The new section which contains many
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11547 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
under ยง 767.451, it is clear that the two-year limit does not begin to run again with each new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57878 - 2010-12-15

[PDF] NOTICE
, sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial. Id. We will reverse the denial of a mistrial motion only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34607 - 2014-09-15