Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26491 - 26500 of 58510 for speedy trial.

[PDF] Civil disposition summary: County and district
Trial Court Trial Settlement Default/ Uncontested Judgment Dismissed Before Trial Other Median Age
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/civildispocounty18.pdf - 2019-02-26

[PDF] Civil Disposition Summary - County Wide Report
Trial Court Trial Settlement Default/ Uncontested Judgment Dismissed Before Trial Other Median Age
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/civildispocounty21.pdf - 2022-02-22

[PDF] Civil disposition summary: County and district
Trial Court Trial Settlement Default/ Uncontested Judgment Dismissed Before Trial Other Median Age
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/civildispocounty20.pdf - 2021-02-11

[PDF] State v. Kweku Fitzpatrick
and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. Because we conclude that the trial court correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8525 - 2017-09-19

Payrollwise, Inc. v. Sterling Truck Corporation
an order denying its motion for summary judgment.[1] It claims the trial court erred in denying its motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6630 - 2005-03-31

State v. Roger M. Spencer
the Fourth Amendment. The trial court denied the motions. Spencer pleaded no contest to the OWI count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2483 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Kenosha County Department of Child & Family Services v. Cornelius N. F.
. Although, after the first day of jury trial, he 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6377 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
contends the trial court erred in finding that his refusal to consent to a blood test was unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32630 - 2014-09-15

Fred J. Perri v. Diocese of La Crosse
complaint against the Diocese of La Crosse, which operates the school. The trial court granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8582 - 2005-03-31

State v. Derek A. Miller
for contempt, respectively. On appeal, Miller argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15476 - 2005-03-31