Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2651 - 2660 of 6309 for 208.

COURT OF APPEALS
. at 208. ¶10 Here, Officer Navarette effected Contreras’s arrest but, as takedown officer, he was out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36143 - 2009-04-13

State v. Victory Fireworks, Inc.
plain meaning. See Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 365, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15055 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
325, 329-30, 466 N.W.2d 208 (Ct. App. 1991) (stating that credit is awarded on a day-for-day basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362354 - 2021-05-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
recantation evidence must be corroborated by other newly discovered evidence, see State v. McCallum, 208 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134619 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, 329, 466 N.W.2d 208 (Ct. App. 1991). The statute provides that “[a] convicted offender shall
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=472272 - 2022-01-13

COURT OF APPEALS
wishes to relitigate Walgreen/Madison, this is not the correct forum. See Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131662 - 2014-12-16

[PDF] State v. Willie J. Hickles
is necessary to correct a manifest injustice. State v. McCallum, 208 Wis. 2d 463, 473, 561 N.W.2d 707 (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26217 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Certification
[the supreme court] No. 2013AP1392 8 as dictum”); see also Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 189, 560
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110321 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 62, 67, 377 N.W.2d 208 (Ct. App. 1985). 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85608 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Major C. Latimer
Supreme Court specifically rejected that contention in Klessig. Klessig, 211 Wis. 2d at 208-12. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15782 - 2017-09-21