Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2651 - 2660 of 29714 for des.
Search results 2651 - 2660 of 29714 for des.
[PDF]
Lake Country Racquet & Athletic Club, Inc. v. Village of Hartland
apply de novo the standards set forth in WIS. STAT. § 802.08. Voss v. City of Middleton, 162 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4860 - 2017-09-19
apply de novo the standards set forth in WIS. STAT. § 802.08. Voss v. City of Middleton, 162 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4860 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
facts presents a question of law, which we generally review de novo. Tannler v. DHSS, 211 Wis. 2d 179
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29242 - 2007-05-30
facts presents a question of law, which we generally review de novo. Tannler v. DHSS, 211 Wis. 2d 179
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29242 - 2007-05-30
State v. Yolanda L.
, the application of the U. S. Constitution to those facts is a question of law reviewed de novo. State v. Patricia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5810 - 2005-03-31
, the application of the U. S. Constitution to those facts is a question of law reviewed de novo. State v. Patricia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5810 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Sandra K. Murray v. Patrick R. Murray
review de novo. See id. But because this legal determination is intertwined with the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15563 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. See id. But because this legal determination is intertwined with the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15563 - 2017-09-21
State v. Christopher M. Antonicci
are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Franklin, 2004 WI 38, ¶5, 270 Wis. 2d 271, 677 N.W.2d 276
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7277 - 2005-03-31
are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Franklin, 2004 WI 38, ¶5, 270 Wis. 2d 271, 677 N.W.2d 276
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7277 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and Women's Club of De Pere, Plaintiffs-Respondents, Janette Johnson, Involuntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35430 - 2009-02-02
and Women's Club of De Pere, Plaintiffs-Respondents, Janette Johnson, Involuntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35430 - 2009-02-02
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: Linda M. Van De Water, Judge. Judgment affirmed; order reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57780 - 2010-12-14
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: Linda M. Van De Water, Judge. Judgment affirmed; order reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57780 - 2010-12-14
[PDF]
Jack Gasparac v. Mae Schunk
in § 908.045(6) was applicable. DISCUSSION ¶10 We review the grant or denial of a summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4869 - 2017-09-19
in § 908.045(6) was applicable. DISCUSSION ¶10 We review the grant or denial of a summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4869 - 2017-09-19
Deborah A. (Mumaw) Carpenter v. Thomas L. Mumaw
to $139.17 a month and the maintenance obligation to $500 a month. Carpenter moved for a hearing de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14589 - 2005-03-31
to $139.17 a month and the maintenance obligation to $500 a month. Carpenter moved for a hearing de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14589 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See ibid. “If the terms of the contract are plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26695 - 2014-09-15
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See ibid. “If the terms of the contract are plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26695 - 2014-09-15