Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2651 - 2660 of 6391 for dr.
Search results 2651 - 2660 of 6391 for dr.
State v. Thomas Treadway
” supporting the State’s next witness, Dr. Sheila J. Fields, a psychologist. Thus, the court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3211 - 2005-03-31
” supporting the State’s next witness, Dr. Sheila J. Fields, a psychologist. Thus, the court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3211 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Natisha W.
great a weight on Dr. Collins’ report”; (2) it “did not take into account the relationship that Jai
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6451 - 2017-09-19
great a weight on Dr. Collins’ report”; (2) it “did not take into account the relationship that Jai
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6451 - 2017-09-19
State v. Natisha W.
erroneously exercised its discretion in that: (1) it “placed too great a weight on Dr. Collins’ report”; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6451 - 2005-03-31
erroneously exercised its discretion in that: (1) it “placed too great a weight on Dr. Collins’ report”; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6451 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jose DeJesus Fuentes
, Fuentes argues that counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the testimony of Drs. Norman Fost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12508 - 2017-09-21
, Fuentes argues that counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the testimony of Drs. Norman Fost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12508 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 74
area for the required time, and that Dr. Easley did not take steps to prevent actions consistent only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49968 - 2014-09-15
area for the required time, and that Dr. Easley did not take steps to prevent actions consistent only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49968 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Thomas Treadway
, as a “foundation” supporting the State’s next witness, Dr. Sheila J. Fields, a psychologist. Thus, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3211 - 2017-09-19
, as a “foundation” supporting the State’s next witness, Dr. Sheila J. Fields, a psychologist. Thus, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3211 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Leo E. Wanta
of Wanta’s competency had been raised, the court ordered a competency evaluation which was completed by Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13586 - 2017-09-21
of Wanta’s competency had been raised, the court ordered a competency evaluation which was completed by Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13586 - 2017-09-21
Renee Kimps v. Leonard M. Hill
, NORTH CENTRAL HEALTH CARE PROTECTION PLAN, NOMINAL-PLAINTIFF, v. DR. LEONARD HILL
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16852 - 2005-03-31
, NORTH CENTRAL HEALTH CARE PROTECTION PLAN, NOMINAL-PLAINTIFF, v. DR. LEONARD HILL
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16852 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 74
occupied the disputed area for the required time, and that Dr. Easley did not take steps to prevent actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49968 - 2010-06-29
occupied the disputed area for the required time, and that Dr. Easley did not take steps to prevent actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49968 - 2010-06-29
[PDF]
Date: June 4, 2021
State v. M.D.M. Milwaukee Per Curiam Case Number Short Caption CountyName 2019AP001284 Dr. Arthur
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=374499 - 2021-06-03
State v. M.D.M. Milwaukee Per Curiam Case Number Short Caption CountyName 2019AP001284 Dr. Arthur
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=374499 - 2021-06-03