Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2651 - 2660 of 26447 for marital settlement agreement/1000.
Search results 2651 - 2660 of 26447 for marital settlement agreement/1000.
[PDF]
Rosa E. Fromm v. William P. Fromm
conclude that the farm on which the parties resided throughout their marriage was marital property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2714 - 2017-09-19
conclude that the farm on which the parties resided throughout their marriage was marital property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2714 - 2017-09-19
David R. Umhoefer v. Police and Fire Commission of the City of Mequon
, was allowed to invoke the marital privilege against testifying. We agree that Umhoefer’s due process rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4737 - 2005-03-31
, was allowed to invoke the marital privilege against testifying. We agree that Umhoefer’s due process rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4737 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Vicky L. Stellflue v. Lloyd C. Stellflue
of marriage and on the basis of hardship, the trial court included in the marital estate some farm real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10707 - 2017-09-20
of marriage and on the basis of hardship, the trial court included in the marital estate some farm real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10707 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
the parties’ prenuptial property agreement, Chris was entitled to have the engagement and wedding rings he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113092 - 2014-05-22
the parties’ prenuptial property agreement, Chris was entitled to have the engagement and wedding rings he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113092 - 2014-05-22
Eric W. Kruger v. Christina L. Kruger
to apply proper legal standards when it divided the parties’ marital estate and that it erred by awarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16296 - 2005-03-31
to apply proper legal standards when it divided the parties’ marital estate and that it erred by awarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16296 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously: (1) failed to determine that Margaret committed marital waste; (2) considered his pension at its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56375 - 2010-11-09
erroneously: (1) failed to determine that Margaret committed marital waste; (2) considered his pension at its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56375 - 2010-11-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the trial court erroneously: (1) failed to determine that Margaret committed marital waste; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56375 - 2014-09-15
that the trial court erroneously: (1) failed to determine that Margaret committed marital waste; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56375 - 2014-09-15
Kathleen Ventura v. Michael Ventura
of a particular marital asset is a finding of fact which we will not upset unless clearly erroneous. See Sharon v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13811 - 2005-03-31
of a particular marital asset is a finding of fact which we will not upset unless clearly erroneous. See Sharon v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13811 - 2005-03-31
Lynn Wonka v. Samuel Cari
and Donna Bierbrauer held the property as marital property without survivorship rights until Edward’s death
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3522 - 2005-03-31
and Donna Bierbrauer held the property as marital property without survivorship rights until Edward’s death
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3522 - 2005-03-31
Michael Martin Burds v. Kathy Ann Walsh-Burds
of marital property ordered by the trial court. She also appeals an order denying her motion to reconsider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10892 - 2005-03-31
of marital property ordered by the trial court. She also appeals an order denying her motion to reconsider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10892 - 2005-03-31