Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2651 - 2660 of 9119 for op.
Search results 2651 - 2660 of 9119 for op.
Frontsheet
of the court of appeals, State v. Her, No. 2006AP1239-CR, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. Aug. 29, 2007
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32656 - 2008-05-08
of the court of appeals, State v. Her, No. 2006AP1239-CR, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. Aug. 29, 2007
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32656 - 2008-05-08
CA Blank Order
and for postconviction access to them. See State v. Leiser, No. 2013AP315, unpublished slip op. ¶9 (WI App Jan. 30, 2014).
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138500 - 2015-03-24
and for postconviction access to them. See State v. Leiser, No. 2013AP315, unpublished slip op. ¶9 (WI App Jan. 30, 2014).
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138500 - 2015-03-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Hacek, Nos. 2014AP1452- CRNM and 2015AP1273-CRNM, unpublished op. and order (WI App Oct. 21, 2015
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435191 - 2021-10-06
. Hacek, Nos. 2014AP1452- CRNM and 2015AP1273-CRNM, unpublished op. and order (WI App Oct. 21, 2015
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435191 - 2021-10-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, unpublished slip op. (WI App Oct. 14, 2009). Marquardt also challenged the effectiveness of his counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114652 - 2017-09-21
, unpublished slip op. (WI App Oct. 14, 2009). Marquardt also challenged the effectiveness of his counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114652 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Romondo D. Seymour
. Seymour, Case No. 93-2242-CR, unpublished slip op. (Ct. App. April 4, 1996). Our remand direction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14773 - 2017-09-21
. Seymour, Case No. 93-2242-CR, unpublished slip op. (Ct. App. April 4, 1996). Our remand direction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14773 - 2017-09-21
State v. Romondo D. Seymour
slip op. (Ct. App. April 4, 1996). Our remand direction stated: “On remand, the State may elect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14773 - 2005-03-31
slip op. (Ct. App. April 4, 1996). Our remand direction stated: “On remand, the State may elect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14773 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Paul Rutzinski
and circumstances.’” Williams, slip op. at 9 (quoting State v. Richardson, 156 Wis.2d 128, 139–140, 456 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14890 - 2017-09-21
and circumstances.’” Williams, slip op. at 9 (quoting State v. Richardson, 156 Wis.2d 128, 139–140, 456 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14890 - 2017-09-21
Mary Gillies v. Milwaukee County
slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. January 27, 1998). [3] Because our decision on this point disposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14206 - 2005-03-31
slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. January 27, 1998). [3] Because our decision on this point disposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14206 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the judgment of conviction. See State v. Ellis, No. 2003AP3119-CRNM, unpublished slip op. at 9 (WI App May 23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33622 - 2008-08-04
the judgment of conviction. See State v. Ellis, No. 2003AP3119-CRNM, unpublished slip op. at 9 (WI App May 23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33622 - 2008-08-04
State v. Tonya G.
that the place where a juvenile resides is the juvenile’s domicile, not the juvenile’s residence. Slip op. at 19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12939 - 2005-03-31
that the place where a juvenile resides is the juvenile’s domicile, not the juvenile’s residence. Slip op. at 19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12939 - 2005-03-31