Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2651 - 2660 of 17242 for probate/1000.
Search results 2651 - 2660 of 17242 for probate/1000.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, and to complete 15 years of probation. He was also fined $5,000, ordered to pay costs, and ordered
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293169 - 2020-09-30
, and to complete 15 years of probation. He was also fined $5,000, ordered to pay costs, and ordered
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293169 - 2020-09-30
[PDF]
State v. Thomas William Koeppen
to serve three years probation. However, Judge Dreyfus further ordered that the probation term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10772 - 2017-09-20
to serve three years probation. However, Judge Dreyfus further ordered that the probation term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10772 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for challenging the sentences imposed after revocation of Sexton’s probation. Sexton was informed of her right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262712 - 2020-06-02
for challenging the sentences imposed after revocation of Sexton’s probation. Sexton was informed of her right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262712 - 2020-06-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
there is no basis for challenging the sentence imposed after revocation of Pingel’s probation. Pingel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141759 - 2017-09-21
there is no basis for challenging the sentence imposed after revocation of Pingel’s probation. Pingel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141759 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Christopher A. Wolter
while intoxicated, and from an order denying reconsideration of the probation sentence imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15984 - 2017-09-21
while intoxicated, and from an order denying reconsideration of the probation sentence imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15984 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Carl Simonetto
, challenges a condition of probation that he not “go where children may congregate” as being vague
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15166 - 2017-09-21
, challenges a condition of probation that he not “go where children may congregate” as being vague
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15166 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
after revocation of his probation. Dennis Schertz, Voss’s appointed counsel, filed a no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300358 - 2020-10-29
after revocation of his probation. Dennis Schertz, Voss’s appointed counsel, filed a no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300358 - 2020-10-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to consider the mandatory sentencing factors and implicitly rejected probation with a misunderstanding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350381 - 2021-03-31
to consider the mandatory sentencing factors and implicitly rejected probation with a misunderstanding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350381 - 2021-03-31
State v. Andres Godina
assumptions about the probation agent’s recommendation. We reject these contentions and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13093 - 2005-03-31
assumptions about the probation agent’s recommendation. We reject these contentions and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13093 - 2005-03-31
State v. Andres Godina
assumptions about the probation agent’s recommendation. We reject these contentions and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13092 - 2005-03-31
assumptions about the probation agent’s recommendation. We reject these contentions and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13092 - 2005-03-31