Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2651 - 2660 of 17241 for probate/1000.
Search results 2651 - 2660 of 17241 for probate/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case is contrary to a previous probate judgment concerning the same property, and that its factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35458 - 2009-02-04
in this case is contrary to a previous probate judgment concerning the same property, and that its factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35458 - 2009-02-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
there is no basis for challenging the sentence imposed after revocation of Pingel’s probation. Pingel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141759 - 2017-09-21
there is no basis for challenging the sentence imposed after revocation of Pingel’s probation. Pingel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141759 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for challenging the sentences imposed after revocation of Sexton’s probation. Sexton was informed of her right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262712 - 2020-06-02
for challenging the sentences imposed after revocation of Sexton’s probation. Sexton was informed of her right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262712 - 2020-06-02
[PDF]
State v. Christopher A. Wolter
while intoxicated, and from an order denying reconsideration of the probation sentence imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15984 - 2017-09-21
while intoxicated, and from an order denying reconsideration of the probation sentence imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15984 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Frances Nienhardt
-2- her to stay out of the city of Cedarburg during the duration of her probation. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8285 - 2017-09-19
-2- her to stay out of the city of Cedarburg during the duration of her probation. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8285 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to consider the mandatory sentencing factors and implicitly rejected probation with a misunderstanding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350381 - 2021-03-31
to consider the mandatory sentencing factors and implicitly rejected probation with a misunderstanding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350381 - 2021-03-31
State v. Carl Simonetto
of possessing child pornography, challenges a condition of probation that he not “go where children may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15166 - 2005-03-31
of possessing child pornography, challenges a condition of probation that he not “go where children may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15166 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
probation with an imposed and stayed prison sentence. Trial counsel immediately forwarded the new offer
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156180 - 2017-09-21
probation with an imposed and stayed prison sentence. Trial counsel immediately forwarded the new offer
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156180 - 2017-09-21
State v. Frances Nienhardt
probation. We affirm the judgment because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8285 - 2005-03-31
probation. We affirm the judgment because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8285 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brian C. Wegner
it sentenced him after probation No. 99-3079-CR 2 revocation. We disagree. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16239 - 2017-09-21
it sentenced him after probation No. 99-3079-CR 2 revocation. We disagree. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16239 - 2017-09-21