Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2651 - 2660 of 18714 for quote.
Search results 2651 - 2660 of 18714 for quote.
COURT OF APPEALS
extensively considered the primary sentencing factors, and quoted from both a letter presented at the original
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36732 - 2009-06-08
extensively considered the primary sentencing factors, and quoted from both a letter presented at the original
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36732 - 2009-06-08
[PDF]
Parke O'Flaherty, Ltd. v. Patricia M. Knuth
173, 182, 286 N.W.2d 573 (1980) (quoting Note, Attorney Malpractice, 63 COLUM. L. REV. 1292, 1302
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5592 - 2017-09-19
173, 182, 286 N.W.2d 573 (1980) (quoting Note, Attorney Malpractice, 63 COLUM. L. REV. 1292, 1302
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5592 - 2017-09-19
State v. John R. Jagusch
of record.'" State v. Jenkins, 168 Wis.2d 175, 186, 483 N.W.2d 262, 265 (Ct. App. 1992) (quoting Lievrouw v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11783 - 2005-03-31
of record.'" State v. Jenkins, 168 Wis.2d 175, 186, 483 N.W.2d 262, 265 (Ct. App. 1992) (quoting Lievrouw v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11783 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
as a bar to a subsequent prosecution, nor as a defense to a valid conviction. Id., ¶22 (quoting U.S. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72351 - 2011-10-18
as a bar to a subsequent prosecution, nor as a defense to a valid conviction. Id., ¶22 (quoting U.S. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72351 - 2011-10-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
jury trial’ in an unrelated matter in Waukesha County.” (Quoting the circuit court; emphasis added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102980 - 2017-09-21
jury trial’ in an unrelated matter in Waukesha County.” (Quoting the circuit court; emphasis added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102980 - 2017-09-21
State v. Christopher James
to the victim does not transmute “no” into “yes,” as it once did (see § 944.01(1), Stats. (1973), quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8869 - 2005-03-31
to the victim does not transmute “no” into “yes,” as it once did (see § 944.01(1), Stats. (1973), quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8869 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brett R.T.
, 874 (1974) (quoted source omitted). We will not decide moot issues because it requires a determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13475 - 2005-03-31
, 874 (1974) (quoted source omitted). We will not decide moot issues because it requires a determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13475 - 2005-03-31
Rupert J. Loeffler v. Emma G. Loeffler
, as a pro se litigant, was treated gently and with fairness. He quotes Velich v. Runyon, 860 F. Supp. 1342
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9281 - 2005-03-31
, as a pro se litigant, was treated gently and with fairness. He quotes Velich v. Runyon, 860 F. Supp. 1342
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9281 - 2005-03-31
Bank One v. Christian C. Ofojebe
(Ct. App. 1998) (quoted source and internal quotation marks omitted). ¶8 Jacqueline Ofojebe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18332 - 2005-07-26
(Ct. App. 1998) (quoted source and internal quotation marks omitted). ¶8 Jacqueline Ofojebe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18332 - 2005-07-26
[PDF]
C & B Investments v. Wisconsin Winnebago Health Department
Pueblo, 436 U.S. at 58 (quoting United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 399 (1976) (quoting United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7705 - 2017-09-19
Pueblo, 436 U.S. at 58 (quoting United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 399 (1976) (quoting United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7705 - 2017-09-19