Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26501 - 26510 of 63980 for records/1000.
Search results 26501 - 26510 of 63980 for records/1000.
State v. Everton Taylor
In determining whether probable cause existed for issuance of a search warrant, “we are confined to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3438 - 2005-03-31
In determining whether probable cause existed for issuance of a search warrant, “we are confined to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3438 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not in evidence. Based upon a review of the briefs and record, we No. 2023AP823-CR 2 conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876429 - 2024-11-19
not in evidence. Based upon a review of the briefs and record, we No. 2023AP823-CR 2 conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876429 - 2024-11-19
Larry A. Wynhoff v. Gary S. Vogt
on January 18, 1974. Larry alleged that on September 2, 1975, a warranty deed was recorded showing that Gary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14994 - 2005-03-31
on January 18, 1974. Larry alleged that on September 2, 1975, a warranty deed was recorded showing that Gary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14994 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark Koshney
, 709-10, 303 N.W.2d 821 (1981). When we review a discretionary determination, we examine the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2701 - 2017-09-19
, 709-10, 303 N.W.2d 821 (1981). When we review a discretionary determination, we examine the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2701 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael J. Cauley
that the record of the plea hearing colloquy met the standards established by State v. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d 246
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9637 - 2005-03-31
that the record of the plea hearing colloquy met the standards established by State v. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d 246
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9637 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
during the trial, but it was never admitted into evidence and is not part of the record. Nothing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380418 - 2021-06-29
during the trial, but it was never admitted into evidence and is not part of the record. Nothing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380418 - 2021-06-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
, the defendant has the burden to show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31786 - 2014-09-15
, the defendant has the burden to show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31786 - 2014-09-15
State v. Odell Carter, Jr.
guilt. See id. After reviewing the record and comparing the accusation and the recantation, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16067 - 2005-03-31
guilt. See id. After reviewing the record and comparing the accusation and the recantation, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16067 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Yediael Y. Backstrom
violates his privilege against self-incrimination. Because the record demonstrates that Backstrom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25049 - 2017-09-21
violates his privilege against self-incrimination. Because the record demonstrates that Backstrom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25049 - 2017-09-21
Boulanger Construction Co., Inc. v. United Fire and Casualty Company
by the record, and we reverse and remand that portion of the judgment.[2] ¶2 Advance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6971 - 2005-03-31
by the record, and we reverse and remand that portion of the judgment.[2] ¶2 Advance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6971 - 2005-03-31