Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26501 - 26510 of 83244 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 26501 - 26510 of 83244 for simple case search/1000.
Megal Development Corporation v. Craig Shadof
809.61 (2001-02)[1] this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court for its
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1239 - 2004-10-26
809.61 (2001-02)[1] this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court for its
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1239 - 2004-10-26
[PDF]
WI APP 60
2008 WI APP 60 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2007AP1181
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32131 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI APP 60 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2007AP1181
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32131 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the complaint, making the case a contested matter. The court scheduled an eviction hearing for October 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197312 - 2017-10-04
to the complaint, making the case a contested matter. The court scheduled an eviction hearing for October 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197312 - 2017-10-04
Kenosha County DHS v. Katrina R.
the necessary substitution form for Katrina. The judge also indicated that the case likely would be assigned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20986 - 2006-01-16
the necessary substitution form for Katrina. The judge also indicated that the case likely would be assigned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20986 - 2006-01-16
[PDF]
WI App 20
2020 WI App 20 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2018AP1037
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257968 - 2020-06-15
2020 WI App 20 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2018AP1037
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257968 - 2020-06-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and the “value of permanency” for him out of the case; and (3) erroneously elicited detrimental testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920348 - 2025-02-26
and the “value of permanency” for him out of the case; and (3) erroneously elicited detrimental testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920348 - 2025-02-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
during the period relevant to this case. All references to the DNR’s administrative regulations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929022 - 2025-03-18
during the period relevant to this case. All references to the DNR’s administrative regulations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929022 - 2025-03-18
[PDF]
Kenosha County DHS v. Katrina R.
. The judge also indicated that the case likely would be assigned to Judge Mary Kay Wagner, and offered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20986 - 2017-09-21
. The judge also indicated that the case likely would be assigned to Judge Mary Kay Wagner, and offered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20986 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 86
2007 WI 86 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2005AP767-CR COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29557 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI 86 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2005AP767-CR COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29557 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 147
2010 WI App 147 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP1321 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55515 - 2010-11-16
2010 WI App 147 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP1321 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55515 - 2010-11-16