Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26501 - 26510 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 26501 - 26510 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Terry L. Schroedl
, Schroedl asserts that justice requires a new trial because the circuit court’s admission of the other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3983 - 2017-09-20
, Schroedl asserts that justice requires a new trial because the circuit court’s admission of the other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3983 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment dismissing their action under Wis. Stat. § 805.17(1).[1] The trial court concluded that the land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41821 - 2009-10-05
a judgment dismissing their action under Wis. Stat. § 805.17(1).[1] The trial court concluded that the land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41821 - 2009-10-05
[PDF]
Kenosha County Department of Child & Family Services v. Cornelius N. F.
. Although, after the first day of jury trial, he 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6377 - 2017-09-19
. Although, after the first day of jury trial, he 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6377 - 2017-09-19
State v. David M. Mosel
wished to raise on this appeal in the context of an earlier motion.[2] That issue is: whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10848 - 2005-03-31
wished to raise on this appeal in the context of an earlier motion.[2] That issue is: whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10848 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
victims, interviewed separately, picked Simmons’ photo from the array. At trial, T.D. and M.W
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165874 - 2017-09-21
victims, interviewed separately, picked Simmons’ photo from the array. At trial, T.D. and M.W
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165874 - 2017-09-21
Mark Anthony Adell v. Judy Smith
., Nettesheim and Anderson, JJ. ¶1 ANDERSON, J. Mark Anthony Adell appeals a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2125 - 2005-03-31
., Nettesheim and Anderson, JJ. ¶1 ANDERSON, J. Mark Anthony Adell appeals a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2125 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Strutz
the elements of the offenses, and because the trial court found that Strutz’s claims that he did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14593 - 2005-03-31
the elements of the offenses, and because the trial court found that Strutz’s claims that he did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14593 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, a jury trial was held before Judge Michael Mulroy on the trademark infringement claim. The jury found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36412 - 2009-05-06
, a jury trial was held before Judge Michael Mulroy on the trademark infringement claim. The jury found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36412 - 2009-05-06
[PDF]
Mark Anthony Adell v. Judy Smith
. ¶1 ANDERSON, J. Mark Anthony Adell appeals a trial court order dismissing his petition for a writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2125 - 2017-09-19
. ¶1 ANDERSON, J. Mark Anthony Adell appeals a trial court order dismissing his petition for a writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2125 - 2017-09-19
Mayonia M.M., Jr. v. Keith N.
a paternity action against Keith, presumably pursuant to ch. 52, Stats., 1975.[2] After a trial to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9818 - 2005-03-31
a paternity action against Keith, presumably pursuant to ch. 52, Stats., 1975.[2] After a trial to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9818 - 2005-03-31