Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26521 - 26530 of 84318 for case number.
Search results 26521 - 26530 of 84318 for case number.
State v. Matthew Tyler
. Duychak, 133 Wis. 2d 307, 312, 395 N.W.2d 795 (Ct. App. 1986). In such a case, the defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5702 - 2005-03-31
. Duychak, 133 Wis. 2d 307, 312, 395 N.W.2d 795 (Ct. App. 1986). In such a case, the defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5702 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that his proffered expert testimony substantially conflicted with the State’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90808 - 2012-12-17
that his proffered expert testimony substantially conflicted with the State’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90808 - 2012-12-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for the CHIPS petitions were entered in October 2013, and listed a number of conditions that had to be met
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=545050 - 2022-07-19
for the CHIPS petitions were entered in October 2013, and listed a number of conditions that had to be met
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=545050 - 2022-07-19
[PDF]
Deborah A. (Mumaw) Carpenter v. Thomas L. Mumaw
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2874
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14589 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2874
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14589 - 2017-09-21
Deborah A. (Mumaw) Carpenter v. Thomas L. Mumaw
in this case rounds those numbers down to $30,000. These minor discrepancies do not affect our decision. [2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14891 - 2005-03-31
in this case rounds those numbers down to $30,000. These minor discrepancies do not affect our decision. [2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14891 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Cornell Smith v. Gary McCaughtry
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0703-W Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13732 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0703-W Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13732 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Anthony J. Randle
2002 WI App 116 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-1448-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4020 - 2017-09-20
2002 WI App 116 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-1448-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4020 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
granted the State’s motion after briefing.[1] The case was tried to a jury, which convicted Richardson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104433 - 2013-11-18
granted the State’s motion after briefing.[1] The case was tried to a jury, which convicted Richardson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104433 - 2013-11-18
MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. The State of Wisconsin
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 95-0915 Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17003 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 95-0915 Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17003 - 2005-03-31
Cornell Smith v. Gary McCaughtry
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0703-W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13732 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0703-W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13732 - 2005-03-31