Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26521 - 26530 of 30070 for de.
Search results 26521 - 26530 of 30070 for de.
[PDF]
NOTICE
subject to de novo review. Id. Once the assets subject to division have been identified, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29161 - 2014-09-15
subject to de novo review. Id. Once the assets subject to division have been identified, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29161 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 189
omitted). Whether a reconfinement court violates the statutes, however, is subject to our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34700 - 2014-09-15
omitted). Whether a reconfinement court violates the statutes, however, is subject to our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34700 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 50
purposes presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶23; City of South Milwaukee v. Kester
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142164 - 2017-09-21
purposes presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶23; City of South Milwaukee v. Kester
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142164 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Scott Zastrow
that we review de novo. Wodenjak, 2001 WI App 216 at ¶5. ¶32 In Wodenjak, we held that “a forcible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3716 - 2017-09-19
that we review de novo. Wodenjak, 2001 WI App 216 at ¶5. ¶32 In Wodenjak, we held that “a forcible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3716 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Betzael Castro
constitutes a new factor is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 8, 434 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12431 - 2017-09-21
constitutes a new factor is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 8, 434 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12431 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we decide de novo. Jacobson v. Jacobson, 177 Wis. 2d 539, 546–47, 502 N.W.2d 869
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258066 - 2020-04-16
is a question of law that we decide de novo. Jacobson v. Jacobson, 177 Wis. 2d 539, 546–47, 502 N.W.2d 869
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258066 - 2020-04-16
[PDF]
WI APP 19
interpretation of an insurance policy, a question of law is presented that we review de novo. See Dostal v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780912 - 2024-05-08
interpretation of an insurance policy, a question of law is presented that we review de novo. See Dostal v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780912 - 2024-05-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous, but we review de novo No. 2020AP887-CR 6 whether counsel’s conduct constitutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=481891 - 2022-02-09
erroneous, but we review de novo No. 2020AP887-CR 6 whether counsel’s conduct constitutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=481891 - 2022-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The question of whether the evidence is sufficient to support a conviction is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96735 - 2014-09-15
. The question of whether the evidence is sufficient to support a conviction is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96735 - 2014-09-15
Willie McKinley v. Ken Sondalle
)(a). The interpretation and application of statutes present questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Hughes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15863 - 2005-03-31
)(a). The interpretation and application of statutes present questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Hughes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15863 - 2005-03-31