Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26521 - 26530 of 30066 for de.
Search results 26521 - 26530 of 30066 for de.
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael G. Artery
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21274 - 2006-02-06
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21274 - 2006-02-06
Dairyland Fuels, Inc. v. State
). Despite our de novo standard of review, however, we may benefit from the circuit court’s analysis. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15530 - 2005-03-31
). Despite our de novo standard of review, however, we may benefit from the circuit court’s analysis. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15530 - 2005-03-31
State v. John F. Powers
to which it refers, a task we perform de novo. See Ocasio v. Froedtert Mem’l Lutheran Hosp., 2002 WI 89
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6563 - 2005-03-31
to which it refers, a task we perform de novo. See Ocasio v. Froedtert Mem’l Lutheran Hosp., 2002 WI 89
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6563 - 2005-03-31
St. Francis Home in the Park v. Department of Health and Family Services
de novo DHFS’s interpretations of statutes or administrative regulations. See id. We apply, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13846 - 2005-03-31
de novo DHFS’s interpretations of statutes or administrative regulations. See id. We apply, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13846 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. See id. ¶24 The circuit court noted that trial counsel had moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210691 - 2018-04-10
is a question of law we review de novo. See id. ¶24 The circuit court noted that trial counsel had moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210691 - 2018-04-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. State v. Thiel, 2003 WI 111, ¶21, 264 Wis. 2d 571, 665 N.W.2d 305. However, we review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117807 - 2017-09-21
. State v. Thiel, 2003 WI 111, ¶21, 264 Wis. 2d 571, 665 N.W.2d 305. However, we review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117807 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 42
that is reviewed de novo. DOR v. River City Refuse Removal, Inc., 2007 WI 27, ¶26, 299 Wis. 2d 561, 729 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682775 - 2023-09-21
that is reviewed de novo. DOR v. River City Refuse Removal, Inc., 2007 WI 27, ¶26, 299 Wis. 2d 561, 729 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682775 - 2023-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Barbara A. Buettner
of law, which we review de novo. See Gloria A. v. State, 195 Wis.2d 268, 272, 536 N.W.2d 396, 398 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12348 - 2017-09-21
of law, which we review de novo. See Gloria A. v. State, 195 Wis.2d 268, 272, 536 N.W.2d 396, 398 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12348 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael Thompson
-CR 12 question of law which we review de novo. State v. Poole, 131 Wis. 2d 359, 361, 394 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3411 - 2017-09-19
-CR 12 question of law which we review de novo. State v. Poole, 131 Wis. 2d 359, 361, 394 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3411 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, while benefitting from the circuit court’s analysis. State v. Bobby G., 2007 WI 77
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449597 - 2021-11-04
judgment de novo, while benefitting from the circuit court’s analysis. State v. Bobby G., 2007 WI 77
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449597 - 2021-11-04