Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26521 - 26530 of 38489 for t's.
Search results 26521 - 26530 of 38489 for t's.
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Stynes
. 1987). We will uphold a sentence unless “‘[i]t is so excessive and unusual and so disproportionate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13186 - 2017-09-21
. 1987). We will uphold a sentence unless “‘[i]t is so excessive and unusual and so disproportionate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13186 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Paul E. Magnuson
that “[t]herefore, custody depends upon physical detention by an institution, institution guard or peace
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13904 - 2014-09-15
that “[t]herefore, custody depends upon physical detention by an institution, institution guard or peace
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13904 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
disposition order will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529357 - 2022-06-07
disposition order will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529357 - 2022-06-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
: No. 2016AP685-CRNM 7 [T]here’s a strong need to send a message to you first that what you did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199212 - 2017-10-31
: No. 2016AP685-CRNM 7 [T]here’s a strong need to send a message to you first that what you did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199212 - 2017-10-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is not the only way that a defendant can present potentially mitigating information to the court. “[I]t behooves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-08
is not the only way that a defendant can present potentially mitigating information to the court. “[I]t behooves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-08
Robert Bingen v. Lisa Bzdusek
that [t]he trial court’s interpretation of [Wis. Stat.] § 17.25 was incorrect because it failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4578 - 2005-03-31
that [t]he trial court’s interpretation of [Wis. Stat.] § 17.25 was incorrect because it failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4578 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
), which addresses “[t]emporary disability, during which compensation shall be payable for loss of earnings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123115 - 2014-10-06
), which addresses “[t]emporary disability, during which compensation shall be payable for loss of earnings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123115 - 2014-10-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence was enhanced due to his status as a habitual criminal. Under WIS. STAT. § 939.62(2), “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106015 - 2017-09-21
sentence was enhanced due to his status as a habitual criminal. Under WIS. STAT. § 939.62(2), “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106015 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that trial counsel was not ineffective because: [T]here is no requirement that an expert testify about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92439 - 2014-09-15
that trial counsel was not ineffective because: [T]here is no requirement that an expert testify about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92439 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 21, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
, and “pointed something sharply in [her] back.” She further testified that “[t]he other guy kept hollering, [g
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27185 - 2006-11-20
, and “pointed something sharply in [her] back.” She further testified that “[t]he other guy kept hollering, [g
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27185 - 2006-11-20