Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26531 - 26540 of 30177 for de.

[PDF] WI App 235
. ¶11 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards and methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30458 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
denied this due process right is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139583 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient or prejudicial are each questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Pitsch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352008 - 2021-04-01

[PDF] State v. Rumont Kirkpatrick
, is a matter of law which this court decides de novo. Rewolinski, 159 Wis.2d at 17, 464 N.W.2d at 407
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12485 - 2017-09-21

[PDF]
312. ¶17 Whether a contract is ambiguous is a question of law that we review de novo. Chapman v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=969448 - 2025-06-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. Locke, 177 Wis. 2d at 596. We are to construe the statute broadly, in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103830 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. John F. Powers
) requires us to interpret the statute and the statutes to which it refers, a task we perform de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6563 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 10, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of ...
or denial of a summary judgment motion de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Cole v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63752 - 2011-05-09

[PDF] State v. Garland Hampton
is a question of `constitutional fact' that we review de novo.” Id. at 432, 536 N.W.2d at 441. “While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10257 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] John W. Torgerson v. Journal/Sentinel Inc.
the matter de novo. Crowbridge v. Village of Egg Harbor, 179 Wis.2d 565, 568, 508 N.W.2d 15, 21 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8948 - 2017-09-19