Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26531 - 26540 of 30059 for de.

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo. Snyder v. Badgerland Mobile Homes, Inc., 2003 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36299 - 2009-05-26

Robert Kerl v. Dennis Rasmussen, Inc.
¶8 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5252 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
alleges sufficient material facts to require a hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=915960 - 2025-02-18

Frontsheet
erroneous; legal conclusions reviewed on de novo basis). We agree, therefore, that Attorney Washington
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33127 - 2008-06-19

John W. Torgerson v. Journal/Sentinel Inc.
court and we decide the matter de novo. Crowbridge v. Village of Egg Harbor, 179 Wis.2d 565, 568, 508
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8948 - 2005-03-31

Koepsell's Olde Popcorn Wagons, Inc. v. Koepsell's Festival Popcorn Wagons, Ltd.
of Review ¶2 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same method employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6302 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Edwin W. Conmey
unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20616 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
expertise and authority to decide de novo"). ¶35 Perhaps some of the confusion that appears to have arisen
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264341 - 2020-08-04

[PDF] State v. Leonard J. LaRoche, Jr.
). However, despite our de novo standard of review, we value a trial court’s analysis of the issue. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2295 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 22
The interpretation of a stipulation between parties is a question of law, which we review de novo. Stone v. Acuity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44187 - 2014-09-15