Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26541 - 26550 of 59234 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] Country Meadows West Partnership v. Village of Germantown
action. The Village contended that Country Meadows’s claims should be dismissed because the Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15528 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, it is not necessary for us to detail any of the other claims, counterclaims, or extensive procedural maneuvers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052004 - 2025-12-18

[PDF] Thomas N. Tomczak and Mary Ann Tomczak by John Louis Castellani v. Pete L. Bailey
moved for summary judgment contending that the Tomczaks’ claim was time barred under § 893.37, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9768 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Jace C. Schmelzer v. James P. Murphy
. Schmelzer claims that his former counsel provided ineffective assistance in failing to timely file his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17012 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
Posttermination, Monique raised a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, arguing that counsel failed to: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86109 - 2012-08-14

[PDF] State v. Richard A. Imme
relief based on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Imme contends that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18766 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. James A. Genett
excluded the testimony of his alibi witness. We reject his claims and affirm the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12618 - 2017-09-21

State v. Roy J. Jones
to the habitual criminality enhancer pursuant to § 939.62, Stats. Jones claims: (1) he was denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13720 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Lamarcus D. Jones
attorney’s work. Specifically, Jones claims that John Chisholm, an assistant district attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7107 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Michael J. Wallerman
” evidence. The court accepted the State's claim that Wallerman's attack on Kristin was admissible because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9375 - 2017-09-19