Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26541 - 26550 of 30177 for de.
Search results 26541 - 26550 of 30177 for de.
Ozga Enterprises, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
of summary judgment is de novo and we apply the same standard as the trial court. Brownelli v. McCaughtry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7797 - 2005-03-31
of summary judgment is de novo and we apply the same standard as the trial court. Brownelli v. McCaughtry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7797 - 2005-03-31
Kurt F. Froebel v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
court, it presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Loomis v. Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12257 - 2005-03-31
court, it presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Loomis v. Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12257 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Urquhart Companies
WIS. STAT. § 803.09(1) is a question of law we decide de novo. Armada Broadcasting, Inc. v. Stirn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19623 - 2017-09-21
WIS. STAT. § 803.09(1) is a question of law we decide de novo. Armada Broadcasting, Inc. v. Stirn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19623 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
the court’s order and remand with instructions that the parties’ mediator arbitrate all issues de novo. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970280 - 2025-06-17
the court’s order and remand with instructions that the parties’ mediator arbitrate all issues de novo. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970280 - 2025-06-17
Frontsheet
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. Rechsteiner v. Hazelden, 2008 WI 97
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51661 - 2010-07-01
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. Rechsteiner v. Hazelden, 2008 WI 97
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51661 - 2010-07-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See Carolina Builders Corp. v. Dietzman, 2007 WI App 201, ¶13, 304 Wis. 2d 773, 739
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=358032 - 2021-04-20
review de novo. See Carolina Builders Corp. v. Dietzman, 2007 WI App 201, ¶13, 304 Wis. 2d 773, 739
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=358032 - 2021-04-20
2008 WI APP 34
, which we review de novo. See State v. Tuescher, 226 Wis. 2d 465, 468, 595 N.W.2d 443 (Ct. App. 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31611 - 2008-02-19
, which we review de novo. See State v. Tuescher, 226 Wis. 2d 465, 468, 595 N.W.2d 443 (Ct. App. 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31611 - 2008-02-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. (italics added). No. 2014AP714
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135520 - 2017-09-21
was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. (italics added). No. 2014AP714
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135520 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 22
The interpretation of a stipulation between parties is a question of law, which we review de novo. Stone v. Acuity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44187 - 2014-09-15
The interpretation of a stipulation between parties is a question of law, which we review de novo. Stone v. Acuity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44187 - 2014-09-15
State v. Gary L. Stibb
of the defendant’s right to effective assistance presents a legal question which we review de novo. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4485 - 2005-03-31
of the defendant’s right to effective assistance presents a legal question which we review de novo. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4485 - 2005-03-31