Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26541 - 26550 of 66464 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 26541 - 26550 of 66464 for motion to dismiss.
[PDF]
Kara B. v. Dane County
., the circuit court, Judge Mark A. Frankel, granted Dane County's motion for summary judgment dismissing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16910 - 2017-09-21
., the circuit court, Judge Mark A. Frankel, granted Dane County's motion for summary judgment dismissing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16910 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, denying the District’s motion for summary judgment, dismissing the District’s challenge to the special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90209 - 2014-09-15
, denying the District’s motion for summary judgment, dismissing the District’s challenge to the special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90209 - 2014-09-15
Mikaela R. v. Dane County
County's motion for summary judgment dismissing the § 1983 claims. The court concluded that the Dane
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16965 - 2005-03-31
County's motion for summary judgment dismissing the § 1983 claims. The court concluded that the Dane
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16965 - 2005-03-31
Kara B. v. Dane County
County's motion for summary judgment dismissing the § 1983 claims. The court concluded that the Dane
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16910 - 2005-03-31
County's motion for summary judgment dismissing the § 1983 claims. The court concluded that the Dane
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16910 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
later agreed to dismiss the case so that it could receive the remaining $3.1 million, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35963 - 2014-09-15
later agreed to dismiss the case so that it could receive the remaining $3.1 million, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35963 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to dismiss the case so that it could receive the remaining $3.1 million, although maintaining the amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35963 - 2009-03-23
to dismiss the case so that it could receive the remaining $3.1 million, although maintaining the amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35963 - 2009-03-23
CA Blank Order
exercise of sentencing discretion, Lindsey’s pro se motion to vacate the DNA surcharge, and Lindsey’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142363 - 2015-05-19
exercise of sentencing discretion, Lindsey’s pro se motion to vacate the DNA surcharge, and Lindsey’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142363 - 2015-05-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of the City, dismissing the District’s complaint on summary judgment. The court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90209 - 2012-12-05
of the City, dismissing the District’s complaint on summary judgment. The court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90209 - 2012-12-05
[PDF]
Frontsheet
permission: met with clients and completed fee agreements; drafted various motions, affixed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724888 - 2024-03-01
permission: met with clients and completed fee agreements; drafted various motions, affixed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724888 - 2024-03-01
[PDF]
Mikaela R. v. Dane County
., the circuit court, Judge Mark A. Frankel, granted Dane County's motion for summary judgment dismissing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16965 - 2017-09-21
., the circuit court, Judge Mark A. Frankel, granted Dane County's motion for summary judgment dismissing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16965 - 2017-09-21