Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26551 - 26560 of 29823 for des.
Search results 26551 - 26560 of 29823 for des.
Robert A. Pond v. Jon E. Litscher
)(a). The interpretation and application of statutes present questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Hughes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15810 - 2005-03-31
)(a). The interpretation and application of statutes present questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Hughes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15810 - 2005-03-31
Building and Construction Trades Council of South Central Wisconsin v.
the court’s order dismissing its action. We review summary judgments de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13248 - 2005-03-31
the court’s order dismissing its action. We review summary judgments de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13248 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Therese S., 314 Wis. 2d 493, ¶7. We look to the entire record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115580 - 2014-06-30
is a question of law that we review de novo. Therese S., 314 Wis. 2d 493, ¶7. We look to the entire record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115580 - 2014-06-30
[PDF]
Journal/Sentinel, Inc. v. Philip Arreola
interpretation of statutes as applied to undisputed facts. Accordingly, we will apply the de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9880 - 2017-09-19
interpretation of statutes as applied to undisputed facts. Accordingly, we will apply the de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9880 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Thermond Larry III
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Mann, 123 Wis.2d 375, 384, 367 N.W.2d 209, 212-13 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12992 - 2017-09-21
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Mann, 123 Wis.2d 375, 384, 367 N.W.2d 209, 212-13 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12992 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gary L. Stibb
of the defendant’s right to effective assistance presents a legal question which we review de novo. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4485 - 2005-03-31
of the defendant’s right to effective assistance presents a legal question which we review de novo. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4485 - 2005-03-31
Gary Richards v. First Union Securities, Inc.
decision involves a question of law, “we review the question of law de novo and reverse if the exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18312 - 2005-07-26
decision involves a question of law, “we review the question of law de novo and reverse if the exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18312 - 2005-07-26
Robert A. Benkoski v. Mark A. Flood
that we review de novo. ¶25 Flood argues that the trial court erred in doubling Benkoski’s loss from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2585 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. ¶25 Flood argues that the trial court erred in doubling Benkoski’s loss from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2585 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Ibid. If, however, “the motion does not raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27779 - 2014-09-15
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Ibid. If, however, “the motion does not raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27779 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-FT 11 for protective placement is a question of law that we review de novo. Therese B., 267
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051125 - 2025-12-16
-FT 11 for protective placement is a question of law that we review de novo. Therese B., 267
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051125 - 2025-12-16