Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26551 - 26560 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
determine de novo, however, whether trial counsel provided constitutionally deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377519 - 2021-06-15

[PDF] State v. William F. Williams
deficient representation is a question of law, however, which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15307 - 2017-09-21

State v. Glenn Allen Thayer
construction that we review de novo. See State v. Paulick, 213 Wis. 2d 432, 435, 570 N.W.2d 626 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14950 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI 39
, however, on a de novo basis. Id. We determine the appropriate level of discipline given the particular
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65366 - 2014-09-15

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Carlos Gamino
of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous, but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de novo basis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20713 - 2005-12-19

WI App 152 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP365 Complete Title of...
was improper. We review de novo the grant or denial of summary judgment, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103846 - 2013-12-17

WI APP 75 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1369 Complete Title of...
the question is purely legal, the facts are undisputed, our review is de novo, and the issue has been fully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113884 - 2014-07-29

Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex, Inc. v. Marvelle Enterprises of America, Inc.
conclusions de novo, Chevron Chemical Co. v. Deloitte & Touche, 168 Wis.2d 323, 331, 483 N.W.2d 314, 317 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8872 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 17, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
this due process right is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Id. The United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27786 - 2007-01-16

Mary K. Sulzer v. Mary Susan Diedrich
. As to the legal issues, such as the construction of the divorce judgment, we apply a de novo standard. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16581 - 2005-03-31