Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26561 - 26570 of 30177 for de.
Search results 26561 - 26570 of 30177 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See Carolina Builders Corp. v. Dietzman, 2007 WI App 201, ¶13, 304 Wis. 2d 773, 739
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=358032 - 2021-04-20
review de novo. See Carolina Builders Corp. v. Dietzman, 2007 WI App 201, ¶13, 304 Wis. 2d 773, 739
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=358032 - 2021-04-20
LeRoy M. Strenke v. Levi Hogner
damages awards for “gross excessiveness” is de novo and upheld a $3,500,000 punitive damage award for bad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19182 - 2005-09-19
damages awards for “gross excessiveness” is de novo and upheld a $3,500,000 punitive damage award for bad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19182 - 2005-09-19
2008 WI APP 34
, which we review de novo. See State v. Tuescher, 226 Wis. 2d 465, 468, 595 N.W.2d 443 (Ct. App. 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31611 - 2008-02-19
, which we review de novo. See State v. Tuescher, 226 Wis. 2d 465, 468, 595 N.W.2d 443 (Ct. App. 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31611 - 2008-02-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. (italics added). No. 2014AP714
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135520 - 2017-09-21
was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. (italics added). No. 2014AP714
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135520 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 22
The interpretation of a stipulation between parties is a question of law, which we review de novo. Stone v. Acuity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44187 - 2014-09-15
The interpretation of a stipulation between parties is a question of law, which we review de novo. Stone v. Acuity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44187 - 2014-09-15
State v. Gary L. Stibb
of the defendant’s right to effective assistance presents a legal question which we review de novo. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4485 - 2005-03-31
of the defendant’s right to effective assistance presents a legal question which we review de novo. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4485 - 2005-03-31
State v. Johnell Sartin
is one of law which this court reviews de novo, without deference to the lower courts. State v. Wilson
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16891 - 2005-03-31
is one of law which this court reviews de novo, without deference to the lower courts. State v. Wilson
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16891 - 2005-03-31
Dustin Dowhower v. Simon Marquez
a question of law that is reviewed de novo. The same rules of construction that govern general contracts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3977 - 2005-03-31
a question of law that is reviewed de novo. The same rules of construction that govern general contracts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3977 - 2005-03-31
State v. Barbara A. Buettner
of law, which we review de novo. See Gloria A. v. State, 195 Wis.2d 268, 272, 536 N.W.2d 396, 398 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12348 - 2005-03-31
of law, which we review de novo. See Gloria A. v. State, 195 Wis.2d 268, 272, 536 N.W.2d 396, 398 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12348 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rumont Kirkpatrick
challenge the seizure of the items from the safe, is a matter of law which this court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12485 - 2005-03-31
challenge the seizure of the items from the safe, is a matter of law which this court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12485 - 2005-03-31