Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26561 - 26570 of 61717 for does.
Search results 26561 - 26570 of 61717 for does.
[PDF]
State v. Leo E. Wanta
evidence when an accused claims he is competent; (2) the evidence does not support his convictions; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13586 - 2017-09-21
evidence when an accused claims he is competent; (2) the evidence does not support his convictions; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13586 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jonathon Gils
the inconsistencies prejudiced the defendant, does not comport with Rule 809.19(1)(e), Stats. We also observe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11826 - 2005-03-31
the inconsistencies prejudiced the defendant, does not comport with Rule 809.19(1)(e), Stats. We also observe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11826 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 133
of the Strickland test if the defendant does not make a sufficient showing on either one. See Strickland, 466 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53662 - 2011-08-21
of the Strickland test if the defendant does not make a sufficient showing on either one. See Strickland, 466 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53662 - 2011-08-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
data as “other acts” evidence, and the State does not provide an alternative basis for us to affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189543 - 2017-09-21
data as “other acts” evidence, and the State does not provide an alternative basis for us to affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189543 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Madison v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
or otherwise, are inadequate, and (2) that grave or extraordinary hardship will result if the writ does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4190 - 2017-09-19
or otherwise, are inadequate, and (2) that grave or extraordinary hardship will result if the writ does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4190 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the effective date of the Act. See id., § 131(1). The State does not challenge Villegas’s contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81728 - 2014-09-15
on the effective date of the Act. See id., § 131(1). The State does not challenge Villegas’s contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81728 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
,” when used to mean “salary,” does not include fringe benefits. These cases support our conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143952 - 2015-07-29
,” when used to mean “salary,” does not include fringe benefits. These cases support our conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143952 - 2015-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 16, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
or at a motion hearing.” Lusk does not dispute this, thus we also rely on the criminal complaints
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99430 - 2013-07-15
or at a motion hearing.” Lusk does not dispute this, thus we also rely on the criminal complaints
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99430 - 2013-07-15
[PDF]
WI 21
because the court of appeals stated that the collateral source rule does not apply in UIM cases
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79240 - 2014-09-15
because the court of appeals stated that the collateral source rule does not apply in UIM cases
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79240 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 77
that they did not. It does not appear from the record that any of the three offered an No. 2007AP1578-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32352 - 2014-09-15
that they did not. It does not appear from the record that any of the three offered an No. 2007AP1578-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32352 - 2014-09-15