Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26571 - 26580 of 69398 for as he.
Search results 26571 - 26580 of 69398 for as he.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
For the following reasons, we affirm. At Rogers’s trial, a hotel manager testified that on January 4, 2021, he saw
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077586 - 2026-02-18
For the following reasons, we affirm. At Rogers’s trial, a hotel manager testified that on January 4, 2021, he saw
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077586 - 2026-02-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of first-degree sexual assault of a child and two counts of child enticement. He contends
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789710 - 2024-04-17
of first-degree sexual assault of a child and two counts of child enticement. He contends
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789710 - 2024-04-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of first-degree sexual assault of a child and two counts of child enticement. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789710 - 2024-04-17
of first-degree sexual assault of a child and two counts of child enticement. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789710 - 2024-04-17
[PDF]
State of Wisconsin ex. rel. Bryce Garrett v. Gerald Berge
, of Green Bay, that he was suspending her mail privileges with Garrett because she had mailed Garrett
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6488 - 2017-09-19
, of Green Bay, that he was suspending her mail privileges with Garrett because she had mailed Garrett
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6488 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert C. Wagnon
the judgment of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6998 - 2005-03-31
the judgment of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6998 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Martin V. Yanick, Jr.
Yanick, Jr. appeals from an order that denied his motion for sentence modification. Yanick believes he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6416 - 2017-09-19
Yanick, Jr. appeals from an order that denied his motion for sentence modification. Yanick believes he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6416 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
However, when the judge—who appeared at the hearing by telephone—informed Gering he did not accept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38345 - 2014-09-15
However, when the judge—who appeared at the hearing by telephone—informed Gering he did not accept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38345 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to dismiss/motion to suppress hearing, and again by his postconviction motion, that he had his headlights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33033 - 2008-06-17
to dismiss/motion to suppress hearing, and again by his postconviction motion, that he had his headlights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33033 - 2008-06-17
State v. Eugene Nichols
to §§ 943.20(1)(a), 943.20(3)(a), 943.11, 943.01 and 939.05, Stats. He claims that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10743 - 2005-03-31
to §§ 943.20(1)(a), 943.20(3)(a), 943.11, 943.01 and 939.05, Stats. He claims that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10743 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court’s error resulted in any prejudice or any lack of understanding on his part as to the plea he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121040 - 2014-09-15
that the court’s error resulted in any prejudice or any lack of understanding on his part as to the plea he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121040 - 2014-09-15