Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26571 - 26580 of 34007 for dismissal.
Search results 26571 - 26580 of 34007 for dismissal.
Racine County Human Services Department v. Frank W.
. A finding of unfitness shall not preclude a dismissal of a petition under s. 48.427(2).”) (Emphasis added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7620 - 2005-03-31
. A finding of unfitness shall not preclude a dismissal of a petition under s. 48.427(2).”) (Emphasis added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7620 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the cocaine charge, while the THC charge was dismissed and read in for sentencing. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193660 - 2017-09-21
to the cocaine charge, while the THC charge was dismissed and read in for sentencing. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193660 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charles W. Randle
, counts four through sixteen would be dismissed but “read in” for restitution purposes. The State agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2202 - 2005-03-31
, counts four through sixteen would be dismissed but “read in” for restitution purposes. The State agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2202 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
charge. The State would dismiss the remaining charges and recommend probation at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732531 - 2023-11-29
charge. The State would dismiss the remaining charges and recommend probation at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732531 - 2023-11-29
Duffey Law Office v. Tank Transport, Inc.
from an order granting Duffey Law Office, S.C., over $20,000 in legal fees and dismissing Tank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9662 - 2005-03-31
from an order granting Duffey Law Office, S.C., over $20,000 in legal fees and dismissing Tank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9662 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
entered into a plea bargain where she would plead guilty in exchange for dismissal of the repeater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=618482 - 2023-02-08
entered into a plea bargain where she would plead guilty in exchange for dismissal of the repeater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=618482 - 2023-02-08
Elizabeth Freer v. Michael A. Whitcomb
, Nettesheim and Anderson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Elizabeth Freer appeals from a judgment dismissing her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20975 - 2006-01-24
, Nettesheim and Anderson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Elizabeth Freer appeals from a judgment dismissing her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20975 - 2006-01-24
Mark Olsen v. Edward Hoffmann
for the defendants, dismissing the Olsens’ consumer act claim, the validity of which depended on finding an agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24751 - 2006-04-10
for the defendants, dismissing the Olsens’ consumer act claim, the validity of which depended on finding an agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24751 - 2006-04-10
Martha Brock v. Milwaukee County Personnel Review Board
, a temporary injunction preventing her dismissal pending agency determination of her appeal. See id. at 66
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12007 - 2005-03-31
, a temporary injunction preventing her dismissal pending agency determination of her appeal. See id. at 66
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12007 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and Barbara. William’s and Barbara’s claims against Mark were dismissed, along with Jerome’s counterclaim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103304 - 2017-09-21
, and Barbara. William’s and Barbara’s claims against Mark were dismissed, along with Jerome’s counterclaim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103304 - 2017-09-21