Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26581 - 26590 of 59234 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 26581 - 26590 of 59234 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at the time of trial. We relate the following trial testimony pertinent to the claims on appeal. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239270 - 2019-04-18
at the time of trial. We relate the following trial testimony pertinent to the claims on appeal. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239270 - 2019-04-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on multiple claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The postconviction court denied the motion without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185329 - 2017-09-21
on multiple claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The postconviction court denied the motion without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185329 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was the aggressor.” Thus, the State contends that “any claim that Hughes acted in self-defense by stabbing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995570 - 2025-08-12
was the aggressor.” Thus, the State contends that “any claim that Hughes acted in self-defense by stabbing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995570 - 2025-08-12
COURT OF APPEALS
acts evidence pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 904.04(2). Specifically, he claims that the prosecutor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36152 - 2009-04-13
acts evidence pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 904.04(2). Specifically, he claims that the prosecutor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36152 - 2009-04-13
[PDF]
Wendy S. Zeka v. Gary R. Zeka
claims that the court erroneously relied on Wendy’s expert witnesses’ 1998 appraisals to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3204 - 2017-09-19
claims that the court erroneously relied on Wendy’s expert witnesses’ 1998 appraisals to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3204 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Alexander R. Armstrong
claims: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to sever the two counts; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5161 - 2017-09-19
claims: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to sever the two counts; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5161 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
application for a use-variance. Barbian claims that: No. 2006AP3161 2 (1) the Board did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30658 - 2014-09-15
application for a use-variance. Barbian claims that: No. 2006AP3161 2 (1) the Board did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30658 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of Milwaukee denying his application for a use-variance. Barbian claims that: (1) the Board did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30658 - 2007-10-22
of Milwaukee denying his application for a use-variance. Barbian claims that: (1) the Board did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30658 - 2007-10-22
2007 WI APP 4
. He claims the trial court erred in affirming the authority of the Department of Corrections (DOC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27177 - 2007-01-30
. He claims the trial court erred in affirming the authority of the Department of Corrections (DOC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27177 - 2007-01-30
Gordon K. Aaron v. Byron Axel
N.W.2d 759 (1995). First, the pleadings are examined to determine whether they state a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2343 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 759 (1995). First, the pleadings are examined to determine whether they state a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2343 - 2005-03-31