Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2661 - 2670 of 5454 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) pintu besi double plat Sambikerep Kota Surabaya Jawa Timur.
Search results 2661 - 2670 of 5454 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) pintu besi double plat Sambikerep Kota Surabaya Jawa Timur.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
because he was not entitled to “double credit.” Loging filed a notice of intent to pursue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747296 - 2024-01-05
because he was not entitled to “double credit.” Loging filed a notice of intent to pursue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747296 - 2024-01-05
COURT OF APPEALS
endangering safety were multiplicitous and therefore violated double jeopardy. The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54717 - 2010-09-20
endangering safety were multiplicitous and therefore violated double jeopardy. The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54717 - 2010-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
the judgment of conviction and postconviction order, rejecting Arthur’s claims of Double Jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35506 - 2014-09-15
the judgment of conviction and postconviction order, rejecting Arthur’s claims of Double Jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35506 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Timothy V. Montgomery
counts violated the double jeopardy clause. This claim was not raised in the trial court and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20547 - 2017-09-21
counts violated the double jeopardy clause. This claim was not raised in the trial court and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20547 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jackie Green
is attempting to claim double credit, that he is not entitled to forty-one days’ credit and that Green “has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16207 - 2017-09-21
is attempting to claim double credit, that he is not entitled to forty-one days’ credit and that Green “has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16207 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
had not ordered a withheld sentence at the original sentencing hearing. 2 He also raised double
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109264 - 2017-09-21
had not ordered a withheld sentence at the original sentencing hearing. 2 He also raised double
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109264 - 2017-09-21
Mark J. Santner v. Debbie Mitchell
it violated double jeopardy. Because the facts and circumstances under this case do not satisfy the standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7195 - 2005-03-31
it violated double jeopardy. Because the facts and circumstances under this case do not satisfy the standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7195 - 2005-03-31
State v. Timothy J. Johnson
of his driver's license violated the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11304 - 2005-03-31
of his driver's license violated the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11304 - 2005-03-31
State v. John E. Isom
, and double jeopardy. The circuit court denied the motion without a hearing, finding that Isom had made only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25932 - 2006-08-29
, and double jeopardy. The circuit court denied the motion without a hearing, finding that Isom had made only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25932 - 2006-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS
a double or triple recovery. Ultimately, based on its reading of the stipulation, the court dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72589 - 2011-10-24
a double or triple recovery. Ultimately, based on its reading of the stipulation, the court dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72589 - 2011-10-24