Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2661 - 2670 of 29966 for de.
Search results 2661 - 2670 of 29966 for de.
WI App 66 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1650 Complete Title of...
the circuit court’s decision de novo.” State ex rel. Milwaukee Police Ass’n v. Jones, 2000 WI App 146, ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111596 - 2014-06-24
the circuit court’s decision de novo.” State ex rel. Milwaukee Police Ass’n v. Jones, 2000 WI App 146, ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111596 - 2014-06-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Judgment affirmed; order reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57780 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Judgment affirmed; order reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57780 - 2014-09-15
Deborah A. (Mumaw) Carpenter v. Thomas L. Mumaw
to $139.17 a month and the maintenance obligation to $500 a month. Carpenter moved for a hearing de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14891 - 2005-03-31
to $139.17 a month and the maintenance obligation to $500 a month. Carpenter moved for a hearing de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14891 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Watertown v. Jeffrey M. Wagner
which we decide de novo. State v. Kasian, 207 Wis. 2d 611, 621, 558 N.W.2d 687 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5354 - 2017-09-19
which we decide de novo. State v. Kasian, 207 Wis. 2d 611, 621, 558 N.W.2d 687 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5354 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
5 demand for trial de novo. On April 15, 2015, following a court trial that took place on March
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173219 - 2017-09-21
5 demand for trial de novo. On April 15, 2015, following a court trial that took place on March
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173219 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to this case. Freer argues we should apply a de novo standard of review, contending that we implicitly did so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36411 - 2009-05-06
to this case. Freer argues we should apply a de novo standard of review, contending that we implicitly did so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36411 - 2009-05-06
Debra S. F. v. Richard F. B.
to de novo review. State v. Meeks, 2003 WI 104, ¶19, 263 Wis. 2d 794, 666 N.W.2d 859. “[S]tatutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19987 - 2005-10-19
to de novo review. State v. Meeks, 2003 WI 104, ¶19, 263 Wis. 2d 794, 666 N.W.2d 859. “[S]tatutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19987 - 2005-10-19
May a judge or the judge's staff attend a holiday party given by a law firm some of whose members appear before the judge?
Yes, if of a de minimis nature
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=887 - 2005-03-31
Yes, if of a de minimis nature
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=887 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See ibid. “If the terms of the contract are plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26695 - 2006-10-09
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See ibid. “If the terms of the contract are plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26695 - 2006-10-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
are provided as necessary in the discussion section. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review de novo a grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44175 - 2014-09-15
are provided as necessary in the discussion section. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review de novo a grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44175 - 2014-09-15