Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2661 - 2670 of 24970 for extending.
Search results 2661 - 2670 of 24970 for extending.
CA Blank Order
of imprisonment on the first count, with five years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109906 - 2014-03-31
of imprisonment on the first count, with five years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109906 - 2014-03-31
[PDF]
John E. Isom v. Jeffrey Endicott
of extended supervision. 3 Isom did not appeal. ¶3 On March 21, 2003, Isom moved pro se for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26297 - 2017-09-21
of extended supervision. 3 Isom did not appeal. ¶3 On March 21, 2003, Isom moved pro se for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26297 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
jurisdiction over them, and the time to do so could not be extended. Gonzalez moved for reconsideration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347318 - 2021-03-18
jurisdiction over them, and the time to do so could not be extended. Gonzalez moved for reconsideration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347318 - 2021-03-18
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 15, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
that the circuit court misused its discretion in denying his motion to extend the time for filing a reply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28457 - 2007-03-14
that the circuit court misused its discretion in denying his motion to extend the time for filing a reply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28457 - 2007-03-14
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
in that case the time limits were extended based on a motion for reconsideration filed pursuant to entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1038740 - 2025-11-19
in that case the time limits were extended based on a motion for reconsideration filed pursuant to entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1038740 - 2025-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. One of the conditions of extended supervision imposed as part of his sentence was that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572071 - 2022-10-05
. One of the conditions of extended supervision imposed as part of his sentence was that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572071 - 2022-10-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of extended supervision. He appeals. Appellate counsel, Attorney Andrew Hinkel, filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226871 - 2018-11-07
years of extended supervision. He appeals. Appellate counsel, Attorney Andrew Hinkel, filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226871 - 2018-11-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
up to thirty-five years of initial confinement and twenty- five years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252020 - 2020-01-02
up to thirty-five years of initial confinement and twenty- five years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252020 - 2020-01-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement and six months of extended supervision on each count, to run concurrently with each
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260759 - 2020-05-21
of initial confinement and six months of extended supervision on each count, to run concurrently with each
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260759 - 2020-05-21
CA Blank Order
a sentence of thirteen years’ initial confinement and six years’ extended supervision. Harper’s appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97209 - 2013-05-28
a sentence of thirteen years’ initial confinement and six years’ extended supervision. Harper’s appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97209 - 2013-05-28