Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2661 - 2670 of 17241 for probate/1000.
Search results 2661 - 2670 of 17241 for probate/1000.
CA Blank Order
Rauen would be willing to be placed on probation, to which the State did not object. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132589 - 2015-01-12
Rauen would be willing to be placed on probation, to which the State did not object. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132589 - 2015-01-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of his probation. Creggett’s appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121322 - 2014-09-15
of his probation. Creggett’s appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121322 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
judgment of conviction entered after revocation of probation. He entered a no-contest plea in 2009 to one
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91475 - 2013-01-07
judgment of conviction entered after revocation of probation. He entered a no-contest plea in 2009 to one
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91475 - 2013-01-07
State v. John G. Anderson
a pretrial order by testifying that Anderson had violated his probation; (2) stipulating that Officer Cary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16301 - 2005-03-31
a pretrial order by testifying that Anderson had violated his probation; (2) stipulating that Officer Cary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16301 - 2005-03-31
[MS WORD]
CR-213: Order to Extend Probation/for Judgment for Restitution/Court Ordered Financial Obligations
-vs- Defendant’s Name |_| Amended Order |_| to Extend Probation |_| for Judgment
/formdisplay/CR-213.doc?formNumber=CR-213&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2021-01-07
-vs- Defendant’s Name |_| Amended Order |_| to Extend Probation |_| for Judgment
/formdisplay/CR-213.doc?formNumber=CR-213&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2021-01-07
COURT OF APPEALS
, but stayed it and ordered three years’ probation, consecutive to an Illinois sentence he already was serving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131361 - 2014-12-09
, but stayed it and ordered three years’ probation, consecutive to an Illinois sentence he already was serving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131361 - 2014-12-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the trial court’s declaration of property rights in this case is contrary to a previous probate judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35458 - 2014-09-15
that the trial court’s declaration of property rights in this case is contrary to a previous probate judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35458 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. As for the misdemeanors, the State would ask the court to withhold sentence and place Graf on probation for three years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91287 - 2014-09-15
. As for the misdemeanors, the State would ask the court to withhold sentence and place Graf on probation for three years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91287 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to withhold sentence and place Graf on probation for three years with various conditions. The parties agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91287 - 2013-01-07
to withhold sentence and place Graf on probation for three years with various conditions. The parties agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91287 - 2013-01-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, but stayed it and ordered three years’ probation, consecutive to an Illinois sentence he already
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131361 - 2017-09-21
, but stayed it and ordered three years’ probation, consecutive to an Illinois sentence he already
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131361 - 2017-09-21