Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2661 - 2670 of 49848 for writ of certiorari forms.
Search results 2661 - 2670 of 49848 for writ of certiorari forms.
[PDF]
WI APP 78
determination by way of certiorari review. The trial court reversed, concluding that the Board had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308165 - 2021-01-08
determination by way of certiorari review. The trial court reversed, concluding that the Board had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308165 - 2021-01-08
[PDF]
Richard A. Eberle v. Dane County Board of Adjustment
sought certiorari review of the Board’s decision denying their application for a special permit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13088 - 2017-09-21
sought certiorari review of the Board’s decision denying their application for a special permit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13088 - 2017-09-21
Richard A. Eberle v. Dane County Board of Adjustment
County Board of Adjustment. The Eberles initially sought certiorari review of the Board’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13088 - 2005-03-31
County Board of Adjustment. The Eberles initially sought certiorari review of the Board’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13088 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 66
of appealability. The United States Supreme Court denied his petition for a writ of certiorari. ¶12 In 2022
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017867 - 2025-12-17
of appealability. The United States Supreme Court denied his petition for a writ of certiorari. ¶12 In 2022
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017867 - 2025-12-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
because: (1) the writ of restitution Courtyard Apartments used to evict him was facially invalid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29410 - 2014-09-15
because: (1) the writ of restitution Courtyard Apartments used to evict him was facially invalid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29410 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
when it granted Courtyard Apartments’s motion for summary judgment because: (1) the writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29410 - 2007-06-18
when it granted Courtyard Apartments’s motion for summary judgment because: (1) the writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29410 - 2007-06-18
[PDF]
Step Now Citizens Group v. Town of Utica Planning & Zoning Committee
in this motion as did the Town. The Town also moved to quash the writ of certiorari. ¶19 Step Now filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5775 - 2017-09-19
in this motion as did the Town. The Town also moved to quash the writ of certiorari. ¶19 Step Now filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5775 - 2017-09-19
Step Now Citizens Group v. Town of Utica Planning & Zoning Committee
in this motion as did the Town. The Town also moved to quash the writ of certiorari. ¶19 Step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5775 - 2005-03-31
in this motion as did the Town. The Town also moved to quash the writ of certiorari. ¶19 Step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5775 - 2005-03-31
Fran Ingebritson v. The Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Madison
form of relief, seeks review by certiorari of the ZBA's November 12, 1993 decision to affirm Grubb's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10617 - 2005-03-31
form of relief, seeks review by certiorari of the ZBA's November 12, 1993 decision to affirm Grubb's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10617 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Fran Ingebritson v. The Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Madison
by certiorari were moot. We conclude that Ingebritson has standing to challenge the 1986 rezoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9324 - 2017-09-19
by certiorari were moot. We conclude that Ingebritson has standing to challenge the 1986 rezoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9324 - 2017-09-19