Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2661 - 2670 of 50331 for writ of certiorari forms.
Search results 2661 - 2670 of 50331 for writ of certiorari forms.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the inmate … and clearly justif[y] the decision made on 2-07-08. ¶4 Brown petitioned for certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46411 - 2010-02-01
of the inmate … and clearly justif[y] the decision made on 2-07-08. ¶4 Brown petitioned for certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46411 - 2010-02-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
needs to avoid further conduct reports. ¶3 Henderson sought certiorari review of the parole decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49547 - 2014-09-15
needs to avoid further conduct reports. ¶3 Henderson sought certiorari review of the parole decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49547 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for certiorari and reversed and remanded this matter for a new hearing on Zimmerman’s probation revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101011 - 2017-09-21
for certiorari and reversed and remanded this matter for a new hearing on Zimmerman’s probation revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101011 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Mitchell G. Zimmerman’s petition for certiorari and reversed and remanded this matter for a new hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101011 - 2013-08-20
Mitchell G. Zimmerman’s petition for certiorari and reversed and remanded this matter for a new hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101011 - 2013-08-20
COURT OF APPEALS
a decision upon certiorari review affirming the City of Bayfield Plan Commission’s revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96851 - 2013-05-20
a decision upon certiorari review affirming the City of Bayfield Plan Commission’s revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96851 - 2013-05-20
Yusef L. Williams v. Matthew J. Frank
. DISCUSSION ¶3 On certiorari review of a board determination, we apply the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6591 - 2005-03-31
. DISCUSSION ¶3 On certiorari review of a board determination, we apply the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6591 - 2005-03-31
Richard A. Eberle v. Dane County Board of Adjustment
County Board of Adjustment. The Eberles initially sought certiorari review of the Board’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13088 - 2005-03-31
County Board of Adjustment. The Eberles initially sought certiorari review of the Board’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13088 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Richard A. Eberle v. Dane County Board of Adjustment
sought certiorari review of the Board’s decision denying their application for a special permit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13088 - 2017-09-21
sought certiorari review of the Board’s decision denying their application for a special permit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13088 - 2017-09-21
Fran Ingebritson v. The Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Madison
form of relief, seeks review by certiorari of the ZBA's November 12, 1993 decision to affirm Grubb's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10617 - 2005-03-31
form of relief, seeks review by certiorari of the ZBA's November 12, 1993 decision to affirm Grubb's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10617 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Fran Ingebritson v. The Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Madison
by certiorari were moot. We conclude that Ingebritson has standing to challenge the 1986 rezoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10617 - 2017-09-20
by certiorari were moot. We conclude that Ingebritson has standing to challenge the 1986 rezoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10617 - 2017-09-20