Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26601 - 26610 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] Fethiye F. Uygur v. Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc.
in Violette v. Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc., 62 F.3d 8 (1st Cir. 1995). The circuit court denied her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16170 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Mark L. Stewart
to hold an evidentiary hearing on his motion to collaterally attack a prior OWI conviction used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21509 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jesus R.
. Jesus R. appeals from trial court orders terminating his parental rights and denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11792 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
). Frederick Bernard Linder, Jr., pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=598174 - 2022-12-13

[PDF] Eric Winkelman v. Town of Delafield
and the Winkelmans failed to raze the house. To enforce the condition of the variance, the Board brought a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16268 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Leonard L. Jones v. State
indicate that he filed a “motion” seeking return of the money. The record contains no such motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13259 - 2017-09-21

State v. Paul Sappington
of first-degree sexual assault of a child and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16200 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Christopher A. Kitti
of the offense. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial after the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15381 - 2017-09-21

State v. Donald Wolfgram
employer, the City of Mayville. By pretrial motion, the State moved to introduce evidence of that scheme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7765 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, and it did not provide an appraisal tied to the date of taking. Two months later, the DOT filed a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105738 - 2017-09-21