Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26601 - 26610 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 26601 - 26610 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Donavan D. Theno
counsel was ineffective for not moving to have a juror struck for cause. In addition to his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16027 - 2005-03-31
counsel was ineffective for not moving to have a juror struck for cause. In addition to his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16027 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claim that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to support the guilty verdicts. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=468132 - 2022-01-04
claim that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to support the guilty verdicts. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=468132 - 2022-01-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” warrants plea withdrawal. Hampton also claims the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216034 - 2018-07-24
” warrants plea withdrawal. Hampton also claims the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216034 - 2018-07-24
[PDF]
Wendy S. Zeka v. Gary R. Zeka
claims that the court erroneously relied on Wendy’s expert witnesses’ 1998 appraisals to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3204 - 2017-09-19
claims that the court erroneously relied on Wendy’s expert witnesses’ 1998 appraisals to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3204 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Alexander R. Armstrong
claims: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to sever the two counts; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5161 - 2017-09-19
claims: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to sever the two counts; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5161 - 2017-09-19
Kaloti Enterprises, Inc. v. Kellogg Sales Company
of business. FACTS This is an appeal of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1242 - 2004-05-11
of business. FACTS This is an appeal of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1242 - 2004-05-11
COURT OF APPEALS
, and that he deserves a Machner hearing on his claim that trial counsel was ineffective for not objecting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132025 - 2015-01-01
, and that he deserves a Machner hearing on his claim that trial counsel was ineffective for not objecting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132025 - 2015-01-01
[PDF]
Country Meadows West Partnership v. Village of Germantown
action. The Village contended that Country Meadows’s claims should be dismissed because the Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15528 - 2017-09-21
action. The Village contended that Country Meadows’s claims should be dismissed because the Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15528 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Thomas N. Tomczak and Mary Ann Tomczak by John Louis Castellani v. Pete L. Bailey
moved for summary judgment contending that the Tomczaks’ claim was time barred under § 893.37, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9768 - 2017-09-19
moved for summary judgment contending that the Tomczaks’ claim was time barred under § 893.37, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9768 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
George Dufield v. Tom McCormick
of the existence and location of the easement. He alternatively claims he established exclusive ownership
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7478 - 2017-09-20
of the existence and location of the easement. He alternatively claims he established exclusive ownership
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7478 - 2017-09-20