Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26611 - 26620 of 29823 for des.

COURT OF APPEALS
decide de novo. When doing so, however, we must give weight to a trial court’s decision because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36131 - 2009-04-13

State v. Rumont Kirkpatrick
challenge the seizure of the items from the safe, is a matter of law which this court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12485 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 27, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appe...
in his second postconviction motion is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Tolefree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80031 - 2012-03-26

[PDF] WI APP 19
interpretation of an insurance policy, a question of law is presented that we review de novo. See Dostal v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780912 - 2024-05-08

WI APP 127 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP2875 Complete Title o...
judgment. Whether the trial court applied the proper legal standard is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88558 - 2012-12-13

[PDF] League of Wisconsin Municipalities v. Wisconsin Department of Commerce
review is de novo, but in deciding this question of law, we are to derive “benefit” from the experience
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3852 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Therese S., 314 Wis. 2d 493, ¶7. We look to the entire record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115580 - 2014-06-30

[PDF] Frontsheet
of a statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo." Meriter Hosp., Inc. v. Dane Cnty., 2004
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106063 - 2017-09-21

Gordon J. Grube v. John L. Daun
, 668, 476 N.W.2d 593 (Ct. App. 1991). Thus, a question of law is presented which we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17055 - 2005-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Edwin W. Conmey
erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20616 - 2005-12-12