Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26611 - 26620 of 40447 for probate forms/1000.
Search results 26611 - 26620 of 40447 for probate forms/1000.
James Turner. v. David H. Schwarz
“[T]he review process for both probation and parole revocation is identical.” State ex rel. Macemon v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13897 - 2005-03-31
“[T]he review process for both probation and parole revocation is identical.” State ex rel. Macemon v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13897 - 2005-03-31
State v. Oto Orlik
the defendant is currently on probation, extended supervision or parole, whether the defendant is already
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14570 - 2005-03-31
the defendant is currently on probation, extended supervision or parole, whether the defendant is already
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14570 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that “Bailey was on paper and his probation officer would make sure that he showed up in court.” ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109920 - 2017-09-21
that “Bailey was on paper and his probation officer would make sure that he showed up in court.” ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109920 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and being placed on probation. Because the defense delved into the circumstances of the prior sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90232 - 2012-12-10
and being placed on probation. Because the defense delved into the circumstances of the prior sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90232 - 2012-12-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
We observe that I.S. was on probation for a 2013 criminal conviction when C.C.S. was born
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186885 - 2017-09-21
We observe that I.S. was on probation for a 2013 criminal conviction when C.C.S. was born
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186885 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 21
in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Sostarich was sentenced in federal court to three years probation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32236 - 2014-09-15
in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Sostarich was sentenced in federal court to three years probation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32236 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 137
the probate of the Sheboygan County estate, Attorney Raftery violated former SCR 20:1.3. ¶17
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31168 - 2014-09-15
the probate of the Sheboygan County estate, Attorney Raftery violated former SCR 20:1.3. ¶17
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31168 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
years’ extended supervision, and placed Zastrow on three years’ probation, to be served consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237752 - 2019-03-21
years’ extended supervision, and placed Zastrow on three years’ probation, to be served consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237752 - 2019-03-21
COURT OF APPEALS
’ extended supervision—and probation on the remaining counts. The parties also recommended that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61151 - 2011-03-14
’ extended supervision—and probation on the remaining counts. The parties also recommended that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61151 - 2011-03-14
COURT OF APPEALS
of probation, to be served concurrently, on the remaining three counts. The court stayed the prison term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36478 - 2009-05-19
of probation, to be served concurrently, on the remaining three counts. The court stayed the prison term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36478 - 2009-05-19