Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26611 - 26620 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 26611 - 26620 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Paul T. Tatum
it. At the plea hearing, the trial court questioned Tatum after Tatum said that he was pleading guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24813 - 2017-09-21
it. At the plea hearing, the trial court questioned Tatum after Tatum said that he was pleading guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24813 - 2017-09-21
James Hanlon v. Town Board of Milton
deference to the trial court's decision. See Steenberg v. Town of Oakfield, 167 Wis.2d 566, 571, 482 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10252 - 2005-03-31
deference to the trial court's decision. See Steenberg v. Town of Oakfield, 167 Wis.2d 566, 571, 482 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10252 - 2005-03-31
State v. Deandra S. Carter
to §§ 931.14(t), 961.01(14), and 961.41(3g)(e), Stats. Carter claims the trial court erred in denying her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12704 - 2005-03-31
to §§ 931.14(t), 961.01(14), and 961.41(3g)(e), Stats. Carter claims the trial court erred in denying her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12704 - 2005-03-31
State v. David J. Dietzman
to expose her pubic area. He argues that the trial court violated his constitutional right to call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14258 - 2005-03-31
to expose her pubic area. He argues that the trial court violated his constitutional right to call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14258 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Constitution, John D.D. argues that the circuit court erred by ordering him, without a jury trial, to reimburse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36842 - 2009-06-17
Constitution, John D.D. argues that the circuit court erred by ordering him, without a jury trial, to reimburse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36842 - 2009-06-17
State v. Lamont Williams
of which he had been convicted. The trial court imposed a sentence structure, which resulted in a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7630 - 2005-03-31
of which he had been convicted. The trial court imposed a sentence structure, which resulted in a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7630 - 2005-03-31
Mark Kypke v. Atterbury
the employee by name. On December 5, 1995, the trial court dismissed the action against Dr. McDermott, based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6270 - 2005-03-31
the employee by name. On December 5, 1995, the trial court dismissed the action against Dr. McDermott, based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6270 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Deborah J. Hagen v. Viterbo College
Dykman, P.J., Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. PER CURIAM. Deborah Hagen appeals from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12730 - 2017-09-21
Dykman, P.J., Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. PER CURIAM. Deborah Hagen appeals from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12730 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
hearing or a new trial based on multiple claims, including the following: trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=499170 - 2022-03-29
hearing or a new trial based on multiple claims, including the following: trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=499170 - 2022-03-29
State v. Paul H. Willis
that “I see no harm that could be done in granting it.”[1] A successor trial court denied the request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6147 - 2005-03-31
that “I see no harm that could be done in granting it.”[1] A successor trial court denied the request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6147 - 2005-03-31