Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26631 - 26640 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 26631 - 26640 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Peter J. Bartram
to suppress evidence from that search. The motion was accompanied by an affidavit by Bartram’s counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15864 - 2017-09-21
to suppress evidence from that search. The motion was accompanied by an affidavit by Bartram’s counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15864 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
motion and the subsequent order denying his motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959265 - 2025-05-21
motion and the subsequent order denying his motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959265 - 2025-05-21
COURT OF APPEALS
postdisposition motion. Paris argues the evidence presented at his motion hearing was insufficient to prove his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36405 - 2009-05-04
postdisposition motion. Paris argues the evidence presented at his motion hearing was insufficient to prove his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36405 - 2009-05-04
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
criminal offender. Hibbler also appeals from the court’s order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=941051 - 2025-04-16
criminal offender. Hibbler also appeals from the court’s order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=941051 - 2025-04-16
State v. Anthony K. Murphy
postconviction motion. Murphy claims that his trial lawyer was ineffective.[1] We affirm. I. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26099 - 2006-08-07
postconviction motion. Murphy claims that his trial lawyer was ineffective.[1] We affirm. I. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26099 - 2006-08-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion collaterally attacking, for sentencing purposes, his second offense OWI conviction. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69382 - 2014-09-15
his motion collaterally attacking, for sentencing purposes, his second offense OWI conviction. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69382 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
for an alternate test, we affirm. ¶2 After his arrest for second-offense drunk driving, Gobis filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31980 - 2014-09-15
for an alternate test, we affirm. ¶2 After his arrest for second-offense drunk driving, Gobis filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31980 - 2014-09-15
Michael Wysocki v. Town of Kronenwetter
filed motions seeking dismissal of the claims because the Wysockis had never filed notices of claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3795 - 2005-03-31
filed motions seeking dismissal of the claims because the Wysockis had never filed notices of claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3795 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. Robert B. Moodie appeals an order denying his motion to direct Waukesha county to pay his court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59875 - 2011-02-15
CURIAM. Robert B. Moodie appeals an order denying his motion to direct Waukesha county to pay his court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59875 - 2011-02-15
Elaine Wysocki v. Town of Kronenwetter
filed motions seeking dismissal of the claims because the Wysockis had never filed notices of claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3794 - 2005-03-31
filed motions seeking dismissal of the claims because the Wysockis had never filed notices of claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3794 - 2005-03-31