Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26631 - 26640 of 46217 for adulte name change.

Michael H. v. Jeffrey G. N.
and Cade. They point to testimony that they would not have agreed to change guardianship of Madeline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6332 - 2005-03-31

2010 WI APP 59
. At the hearing on the motion, ATC argued: When ATC executed the new easement, the only change not permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47972 - 2010-04-25

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John A. Birdsall
. At that meeting, which Birdsall had surreptitiously videotaped and recorded, Birdsall encouraged D.A. to change
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16711 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Kenneth L. Champion
--most notably a series of DNA tests--had caused them to change their minds. His attorney stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9641 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
on that basis, saying [The trial court] understand[s] th[at] age changes things and health factor[s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28155 - 2007-02-20

[PDF] NOTICE
Smith, 122 Wis. 2d at 437-38. Nonetheless, the legislature did not change the waiver rule exception
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34114 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Bernard A. James
years old at the time—and his failure to change his criminal behavior in spite of the numerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4022 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
Rentas gave Eli change for a pay phone and Eli placed a call. Eli indicated that they had to walk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36143 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Dale Vercauteren v. County of Oconto
to amend a zoning No. 00-2159-FT 2 ordinance.1 The ordinance amendment changed the zoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2905 - 2017-09-19

Brown County Department of Human Services v. Terrance M.
be applied to custody determinations as long as the state of facts has not materially changed. See Beaupre v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7644 - 2005-03-31