Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26631 - 26640 of 38464 for t's.
Search results 26631 - 26640 of 38464 for t's.
[PDF]
State v. Timothy J. Meddaugh
and we adopt it here. 4 The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3714 - 2017-09-19
and we adopt it here. 4 The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3714 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 132
Wis. 2d 475, ¶36 (“[T]he sentencing court has discretion to determine the appropriate remedy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103245 - 2017-09-21
Wis. 2d 475, ¶36 (“[T]he sentencing court has discretion to determine the appropriate remedy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103245 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Prentiss L. Farr
). “[T]he factors that apply to the length of sentence also apply to whether sentences will run
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8974 - 2017-09-19
). “[T]he factors that apply to the length of sentence also apply to whether sentences will run
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8974 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Stynes
. 1987). We will uphold a sentence unless “‘[i]t is so excessive and unusual and so disproportionate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13186 - 2017-09-21
. 1987). We will uphold a sentence unless “‘[i]t is so excessive and unusual and so disproportionate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13186 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CNA Insurance Company v. Pace Corporation
(2001). “[T]he one asserting the right to subrogation cannot profit from his own wrong; he must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4201 - 2017-09-19
(2001). “[T]he one asserting the right to subrogation cannot profit from his own wrong; he must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4201 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this summary disposition order will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289129 - 2020-09-22
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this summary disposition order will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289129 - 2020-09-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 14, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257735 - 2020-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 14, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257735 - 2020-04-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. at 697 (“[T]here is no reason for a court deciding an ineffective assistance claim … to address both
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020949 - 2025-10-09
. at 697 (“[T]here is no reason for a court deciding an ineffective assistance claim … to address both
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020949 - 2025-10-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the record.” On November 22, 2024, we denied the motion and explained that “[t]he court of appeals does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995091 - 2025-08-12
the record.” On November 22, 2024, we denied the motion and explained that “[t]he court of appeals does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995091 - 2025-08-12
COURT OF APPEALS
for his argument is Doggett. He appears to rely primarily on the following passage from that case: [T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108713 - 2014-03-05
for his argument is Doggett. He appears to rely primarily on the following passage from that case: [T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108713 - 2014-03-05