Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26641 - 26650 of 29823 for des.
Search results 26641 - 26650 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
decide de novo. When doing so, however, we must give weight to a trial court’s decision because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36131 - 2009-04-13
decide de novo. When doing so, however, we must give weight to a trial court’s decision because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36131 - 2009-04-13
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo.” Id. (italics added). DISCUSSION ¶19 On appeal, Fortes seeks plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135520 - 2015-03-24
review de novo.” Id. (italics added). DISCUSSION ¶19 On appeal, Fortes seeks plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135520 - 2015-03-24
Albert Trostel & Sons Company v. Employers Insurance of Wausau
. II. DISCUSSION Our standard of review of summary judgments is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9146 - 2005-03-31
. II. DISCUSSION Our standard of review of summary judgments is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9146 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Paul D. Atkinson v. Donald D. Mentzel
275, 280 (1978). Whether an ambiguity exists is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10259 - 2017-09-20
275, 280 (1978). Whether an ambiguity exists is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10259 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Joseph Steffes
erroneous, and we review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5257 - 2017-09-19
erroneous, and we review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5257 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Robert Kerl v. Dennis Rasmussen, Inc.
de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5252 - 2017-09-19
de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5252 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael G. Artery
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21274 - 2017-09-21
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21274 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. State v. Thiel, 2003 WI 111, ¶21, 264 Wis. 2d 571, 665 N.W.2d 305. However, we review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117807 - 2017-09-21
. State v. Thiel, 2003 WI 111, ¶21, 264 Wis. 2d 571, 665 N.W.2d 305. However, we review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117807 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 9
the Commission’s legal conclusions de novo. Id. The interpretation of a statute is a legal conclusion. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314554 - 2021-02-08
the Commission’s legal conclusions de novo. Id. The interpretation of a statute is a legal conclusion. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314554 - 2021-02-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶21. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181180 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶21. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181180 - 2017-09-21