Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26661 - 26670 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] WI APP 163
for our de novo review. WIREdata, Inc. v. Village of Sussex, 2008 WI 69, ¶45, 310 Wis. 2d 397, 751 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74298 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 149
. No. 2013AP290 4 Analysis ¶6 We review an appeal from summary judgment de novo, with the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104527 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] LeRoy M. Strenke v. Levi Hogner
” is de novo and upheld a $3,500,000 punitive damage award for bad faith refusal to backdate insurance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19182 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 184
for our de novo review. See Knight v. Milwaukee County, 2002 WI 27, ¶14, 251 Wis. 2d 10, 640 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34606 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Kathleen Rintelman v. Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Milwaukee, Inc.
to immunity under the statute is a legal issue subject to our de novo review. See Urban, 2001 WI 63, ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20012 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Scott E. Pocius v. Kenosha County
. at 496- 97, 536 N.W.2d at 182. Although summary judgment presents a question of law to be reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14747 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Ozga Enterprises, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
. MARQUETTE COUNTY Our review of a grant of summary judgment is de novo and we apply the same standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7797 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a particular instruction should have been given at all is an issue that we review de novo. See Farrell v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258465 - 2020-04-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
232, 634 N.W.2d 109. “We review the legal issues de novo. However, the circuit court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768307 - 2024-02-27

Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
221, 222–223 (Ct. App. 1997). We also review de novo the trial court’s decision whether the agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5788 - 2005-03-31