Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26661 - 26670 of 38476 for t's.

COURT OF APPEALS
), which addresses “[t]emporary disability, during which compensation shall be payable for loss of earnings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123115 - 2014-10-06

[PDF] NOTICE
of this [lateness] and other absences, the offender has been terminated from S[ex] O[ffender] T[reatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32811 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the presumptive minimum is there for … deterrence…. [T]he legislature has put forth for a reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73387 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. David N. Burkhart
in the following manner: [T]here are now located and concealed certain things, to- wit: various items of stolen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16264 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
added)). Finally, we reject Graves’ argument that “[t]he significance of this situation” in which
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907138 - 2025-01-29

Dolores J. Rindahl v. Ralph G. Rindahl
of the written stipulation that "[t]he wife waives any claim of maintenance from the husband."
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10709 - 2005-03-31

WI App 128 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1637 Complete Title o...
, the supreme court reaffirmed the importance of the subscription requirement, stating that “[t]o hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69688 - 2011-09-27

State v. Angel E.
of degree, "[i]t is a change in quality of the very nature of the acts leading to termination." Jason, 195
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9886 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 21, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
, and “pointed something sharply in [her] back.” She further testified that “[t]he other guy kept hollering, [g
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27185 - 2006-11-20

COURT OF APPEALS
)(a). Limited English proficiency is defined to include “[t]he inability, because of the use of a language other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82292 - 2012-05-09