Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26671 - 26680 of 30059 for de.

[PDF] WI App 218
statement, she indicates that the appropriate standard of review is de novo without providing any citations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30160 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
appeal. DISCUSSION ¶11 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132116 - 2017-09-21

[PDF]
on the interpretation and application of statutes and therefore presents issues of law that we consider de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=882101 - 2024-11-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
adverse possession is a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” Id. ¶19 Generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982819 - 2025-07-15

Frontsheet
presents a question of law, which we review de novo." Meriter Hosp., Inc. v. Dane Cnty., 2004 WI 145, ¶12
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106063 - 2013-12-26

COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo.” Id. (italics added). DISCUSSION ¶19 On appeal, Fortes seeks plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135520 - 2015-02-23

WI App 152 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP365 Complete Title of...
was improper. We review de novo the grant or denial of summary judgment, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103846 - 2013-12-17

State v. Glenn Allen Thayer
construction that we review de novo. See State v. Paulick, 213 Wis. 2d 432, 435, 570 N.W.2d 626 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14950 - 2005-03-31

WI App 149 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP290 Complete Title of...
appeals. Analysis ¶6 We review an appeal from summary judgment de novo, with the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104527 - 2015-06-03

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael G. Artery
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21274 - 2008-06-30