Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26671 - 26680 of 57201 for id.
Search results 26671 - 26680 of 57201 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the facts in the record.” Id., ¶28. “The denial of a motion for mistrial will be reversed only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238249 - 2019-03-28
on the facts in the record.” Id., ¶28. “The denial of a motion for mistrial will be reversed only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238249 - 2019-03-28
[PDF]
State v. Michael L. Washington
performance prejudiced the defense. See id. at 687. Trial counsel's performance is “deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9770 - 2017-09-19
performance prejudiced the defense. See id. at 687. Trial counsel's performance is “deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9770 - 2017-09-19
Frontsheet
such a duty existed presents a question of law. Id. III ¶21 In this case, we address the following question
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29497 - 2007-06-26
such a duty existed presents a question of law. Id. III ¶21 In this case, we address the following question
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29497 - 2007-06-26
State v. Shelleen B. Joyner
or omissions of counsel that are “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Id., 466 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4592 - 2005-03-31
or omissions of counsel that are “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Id., 466 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4592 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law and fact.” Id. “Thus, we will not reverse the circuit court’s findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205688 - 2017-12-14
of law and fact.” Id. “Thus, we will not reverse the circuit court’s findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205688 - 2017-12-14
[PDF]
State v. Leland Jarvey
a reasonable conclusion. See id. ¶18 A trial court considering whether to admit evidence of prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3729 - 2017-09-19
a reasonable conclusion. See id. ¶18 A trial court considering whether to admit evidence of prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3729 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 79
. Id.; see also WIS. STAT. 805.17(2) (2007-08).3 Whether those facts fulfill the elements of a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36484 - 2014-09-15
. Id.; see also WIS. STAT. 805.17(2) (2007-08).3 Whether those facts fulfill the elements of a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36484 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and sanitary or to raze the building, at the owner’s option.” Id. ¶3 An order issued under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112354 - 2014-05-12
and sanitary or to raze the building, at the owner’s option.” Id. ¶3 An order issued under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112354 - 2014-05-12
[PDF]
Frontsheet
enhancer "altered" the applicable minimum fine starting point. Id., ¶23. In other words, once the first
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254227 - 2020-02-14
enhancer "altered" the applicable minimum fine starting point. Id., ¶23. In other words, once the first
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254227 - 2020-02-14
[PDF]
State v. Edward D. Anderson
that he or she was denied the right to a speedy trial de novo. Id. at 508. The first inquiry is always
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19746 - 2017-09-21
that he or she was denied the right to a speedy trial de novo. Id. at 508. The first inquiry is always
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19746 - 2017-09-21